Literature DB >> 12227352

A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults.

Robert F Burkard1, Donald Sims.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of ipsilateral-direct, continuous, broadband noise on auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I and V latencies and amplitudes in young adult versus older adult humans. It was hypothesized that age might influence the effects of masking noise on ABR peak latencies and/or amplitudes, given the frequent complaint of older persons' ability to process speech in background noise. Young adults had hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better for the octave frequencies from 250 to 8,000 Hz. A subset of older study participants had thresholds of 20 dB HL or better across frequency, but others had thresholds up to 45 dB HL. All data were collected and analyzed with a Nicolet Bravo. An electrode was placed on the tympanic membrane (as well as on high forehead and contralateral mastoid), and a click level of 115 dB pSPL was used to maximize wave I amplitude. Masker conditions included a no-noise control and noise levels ranging from 20 to 70 dB effective masking, in 10 dB steps. With increasing noise level, both age groups showed minimal changes in wave I latency, but substantial increases in wave V latency and I-V interval. Peak amplitudes decreased with increasing noise level. Mean amplitudes were smaller for the older group, most notably for wave I. Mean peak latencies were greater in the older group, but the I-V interval was similar across age groups, as was the change in peak latencies and I-V interval across noise level. ABR parameters for the older adults with hearing meeting the 20-dB HL criterion at all frequencies (older-better) were compared to those who didn't meet this criterion (older-worse). Mean wave I latency was greater and wave V latency and I-V interval were smaller for the older-worse group at all noise levels. Mean wave I and V amplitudes were similar for the older-better and older-worse groups. In participants with normal or near-normal hearing, ABR changes with increasing age included small latency increases and a substantial reduction in wave I amplitude. The effects of ipsilateral-direct masking noise on the click-evoked ABR are similar for young and older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12227352     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/004)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  27 in total

Review 1.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2011-12-01

4.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.

Authors:  Kimberly A Jenkins; Calli Fodor; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.

Authors:  A Tierney; A Parbery-Clark; E Skoe; N Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Neural Encoding of Speech and Music: Implications for Hearing Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2011-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.