Literature DB >> 21906656

Musicians demonstrate experience-dependent brainstem enhancement of musical scale features within continuously gliding pitch.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Jackson T Gandour, Ananthanarayan Krishnan.   

Abstract

In contrast to language, where pitch patterns consist of continuous and curvilinear contours, musical pitch consists of relatively discrete, stair-stepped sequences of notes. Behavioral and neurophysiological studies suggest that both tone-language and music experience enhance the representation of pitch cues associated with a listener's domain of expertise, e.g., curvilinear pitch in language, discrete scale steps in music. We compared brainstem frequency-following responses (FFRs) of English-speaking musicians (musical pitch experience) and native speakers of Mandarin Chinese (linguistic pitch experience) elicited by rising and falling tonal sweeps that are exemplary of Mandarin tonal contours but uncharacteristic of the pitch patterns typically found in music. In spite of musicians' unfamiliarity with such glides, we find that their brainstem FFRs show enhancement of the stimulus where the curvilinear sweep traverses discrete notes along the diatonic musical scale. This enhancement was note specific in that it was not observed immediately preceding or following the scale tone of interest (passing note). No such enhancements were observed in Chinese listeners. These findings suggest that the musician's brainstem may be differentially tuned by long-term exposure to the pitch patterns inherent to music, extracting pitch in relation to a fixed, hierarchical scale.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21906656      PMCID: PMC3196385          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  16 in total

1.  Automatic and controlled processing of melodic contour and interval information measured by electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Laurel J Trainor; Kelly L McDonald; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

3.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Auditory illusions demonstrating that tones are assimilated to an internalized musical scale.

Authors:  R N Shepard; D S Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Identification, discrimination, and selective adaptation of simultaneous musical intervals.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; A R Halpern
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-11

7.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.

Authors:  E M Burns; W D Ward
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of structure in short melodic sequences.

Authors:  L L Cuddy; A J Cohen; D J Mewhort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  11 in total

1.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables.

Authors:  A Parbery-Clark; A Tierney; D L Strait; N Kraus
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Experience-dependent plasticity in pitch encoding: from brainstem to auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson Thomas Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Brain signal variability as a window into the bidirectionality between music and language processing: moving from a linear to a nonlinear model.

Authors:  Stefanie Hutka; Gavin M Bidelman; Sylvain Moreno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  Auditory reserve and the legacy of auditory experience.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13

7.  Musical experience strengthens the neural representation of sounds important for communication in middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Samira Anderson; Emily Hittner; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Musical training heightens auditory brainstem function during sensitive periods in development.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-19

9.  Phase locked neural activity in the human brainstem predicts preference for musical consonance.

Authors:  Oliver Bones; Kathryn Hopkins; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Top-Down Modulation on the Perception and Categorization of Identical Pitch Contours in Speech and Music.

Authors:  Joey L Weidema; M P Roncaglia-Denissen; Henkjan Honing
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.