Literature DB >> 21905849

Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position.

Siavash Falahatkar1, Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam, Ehsan Kazemnezhad, Ahmad Enshaei, Ahmad Asadollahzade, Alireza Farzan, Reza Shahrokhi Damavand, Hamidreza Baghani Aval, Somayeh Khodabakhsh, Samaneh Esmaeili.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Operative time influences surgical outcomes, operation-related and indirectly anesthesia-related complications. We investigated variables that affect operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with the complete supine position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed data of 120 patients who underwent complete supine PCNL by one surgeon. Correlation between age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative serum creatinine and hemoglobin levels, history (stone surgery, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), hypertension, diabetes), stone (side, opacity, burden, complexity), imaging for access, calix for access, number of tracts, and tubeless approach with operative time were assessed by univariate and multivariate statistical tests.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 60.62±30.70 minutes. In univariate analysis, age, sex, groups of BMI, hypertension, diabetes, previous stone surgery and SWL, stone opacity, operation side, number of tracts, and tubeless approach had no effect on operative time. BMI (P=0.029, negative correlation), stone burden (P=0.001, positive correlation), imaging for access (P=0.001, fluoroscopy<ultrasonography), calix for access (P=0.035, upper>lower>middle) and probably complex stones (P=0.057, complex>noncomplex) were effective factors on operative time. Multiple linear regression revealed association between BMI (P=0.000, negative correlation), stone burden (P=0.005, positive correlation), imaging for access (P=0.000, fluoroscopy<ultrasonography), and calix for access (P=0.023) with operative time. In lower calix access, mean operative time was less than upper calix access (P=0.022, significant) and higher than middle calix access (P=0.930, nonsignificant).
CONCLUSIONS: BMI, stone burden, imaging for access, and calix for access were effective parameters on operative time in complete supine PCNL. Groups of BMI, previous stone surgery and SWL, number of tracts, and tubeless approach had no effect on operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905849     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Does the presence of hydronephrosis have effects on micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Tuna Karatag; Ibrahim Buldu; Mehmet Kaynar; Ramazan Inan; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Treatment of upper urinary calculi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience with 12,482 consecutive patients over 20 years.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Zanlin Mai; Zhijian Zhao; Xun Li; Wen Zhong; Jian Yuan; Kaijun Wu; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Alireza Farzan; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Ali Ghasemi; Elaheh Shahab; Seyednaser Seyed Esmaeili; Reza Motiee; Seyedeh Alaleh Motiei Langroodi; Mohadeseh Nemati; Aliakbar Allahkhah
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Is micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery technically feasible and efficient under spinal anesthesia?

Authors:  Tuna Karatag; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muzaffer Akcay; Muhammed Tosun; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Abdullah Armagan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Frequency and risk factors for antegrade ureteral stone migration after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hector S Barba; Christian Isaac Villeda-Sandoval; Carlos E Mendez-Probst
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-08-29

7.  Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Majid Kazemzadeh; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Comparison of children versus adults undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-scale analysis of a single institution.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Zhijian Zhao; ShawPong Wan; Wen Zhong; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Gholamreza Mokhtari; Atiyeh Amin; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Samaneh Esmaeili; Nadia Rastjou Herfeh; Reza Falahatkar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  The impact of gender difference on operative time in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumor and the utility of retroperitoneal fat thickness as a predictor of operative time.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Kazuhide Makiyama; Takashi Kawahara; Kimito Osaka; Koji Izumi; Yumiko Yokomizo; Noboru Nakaigawa; Masahiro Yao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.