Literature DB >> 23766832

Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Siavash Falahatkar1, Ehsan Kazemnezhad, Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam, Majid Kazemzadeh, Ahmad Asadollahzade, Alireza Farzan, Reza Shahrokhi Damavand, Hamidreza Baghani Aval, Samaneh Esmaeili.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Middle calyx access has been underused in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), especially in the supine position. We compared the safety and efficacy outcomes between middle calyx and lower calyx accesses in the complete supine PCNL in a non-randomized single-surgeon clinical study.
METHODS: Between February 2008 and October 2011, 170 patients underwent posterior subcostal single tract complete supine PCNL with one-shot dilation and middle calyx (n = 48) and lower calyx (n = 122) accesses. Stone location and surgeon decision determined target calyx for access. Inclusion criteria were pelvis stones, staghorn stones and multiple location stones. Exclusion criteria were renal anomalies, only upper calyx stones, only middle calyx stones and only lower calyx stones. Important parameters were compared between the two groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Two groups were similar in important patient- and stone-related parameters. Mean operative time (60.7 minutes), mean postoperative hospital stay (1.84 days) and mean hemoglobin drop (0.67 g/dL) in the middle calyx group were significantly lesser than in the lower calyx group (80.1 minutes, 2.19 days, 1.36 g/dL). The middle calyx group (89.6%; 79.6%) had a higher stone-free rate (p = 0.054) and efficiency quotient than the lower calyx group (76.2%; 61.6%). In the middle calyx group (10.4%; 2.1%), complication and transfusion rates were lesser (p > 0.05) than lower calyx group (14.8%; 7.4%). No significant difference (p = 0.40) was seen between two groups using the modified Clavien classification of complications.
INTERPRETATION: Middle calyx can be an optimal access in PCNL with the complete supine position for many of upper urinary tract stones due to its superior outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766832      PMCID: PMC3668405          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  25 in total

1.  Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  R Munver; F C Delvecchio; G E Newman; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches.

Authors:  B Lojanapiwat; S Prasopsuk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Ahmad Enshaei; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Somayeh Khodabakhsh; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Erhan Sari; Emrah Yuruk; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Muzaffer Akcay; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Amin Afshari Moghaddam; Mohammad Salehi; Sara Nikpour; Fereshteh Esmaili; Negin Khaki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center's experience over 15 years.

Authors:  Frédéric Soucy; Raymond Ko; Mordechai Duvdevani; Linda Nott; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Monish Aron; Rajiv Goel; Pawan K Kesarwani; Amlesh Seth; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?

Authors:  Carson Wong; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience.

Authors:  Xun Li; Zhaohui He; Kaijun Wu; Shu Keung Li; Guohua Zeng; Jian Yuan; Yongzhong He; Ming Lei
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Quarto; Francesco Calabrò; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Giugliano; Salvatore Mordente; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  7 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Authors:  Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopcu; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; Ömer Sarılar; Murat Binbay; Gökhan Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Costs variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the U.S. from 2003-2015: A contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anne-Sophie Valiquette; Benjamin I Chung; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Rus Korets; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Alireza Farzan; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Ali Ghasemi; Elaheh Shahab; Seyednaser Seyed Esmaeili; Reza Motiee; Seyedeh Alaleh Motiei Langroodi; Mohadeseh Nemati; Aliakbar Allahkhah
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Middle calyx access is better for single renal pelvic stone in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yan Song; Wei Jin; Shengyu Hua; Xiang Fei
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice?

Authors:  Panagiotis Mourmouris; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Lazaros Lazarou; Lazaros Tzelves; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-30

6.  Assessment of lower calyceal single-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: A single-surgeon and a single-center experience at KAMC, Riyadh.

Authors:  Ahmed Aljuhayman; Ibrahim Abunohaiah; Abdulmalik Addar; Muneera Alkhashan; Yahya Ghazwani
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Techniques for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous renal access: An analytical review.

Authors:  Gyanendra Ravindra Sharma; Bhojraj Luitel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.