Literature DB >> 23616180

Treatment of upper urinary calculi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience with 12,482 consecutive patients over 20 years.

Guohua Zeng1, Zanlin Mai, Zhijian Zhao, Xun Li, Wen Zhong, Jian Yuan, Kaijun Wu, Wenqi Wu.   

Abstract

The Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) was a modified version of standard PCNL which utilizes smaller tract and sheaths. The aim of this study was to present our experience on its efficacy and safety, and to grade its complications according to the modified Clavien classification. Between 1992 and 2011, 12,482 patients who underwent 13,984 MPCNL procedures entered this study. Data on stone size, access number, operative time, hospital length of stay, stone-free rate (SFR), and complications according to the modified clavien system were evaluated prospectively. Their mean age of patients was 47.6 years (range 0.6-93). The mean stone size was 3.2 ± 0.8 (1.4-7.4) cm. The mean operative time was 83 ± 38 min. Mean hemoglobin drop was 13.5 ± 11.3 g/L. Mean hospital stay was 10.3 ± 6.4 days (2-22 days). The initial SFR after first procedure was 78.6 %. In 14.7 % of cases with a second look, the SFR increase to 89.9 %. At 3 months after auxiliary procedures (re-PCNL, ureterorenoscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy), the overall SFR was achieved to 94.8 %. A total of 3,624 complications (25.92 %) were observed in 2,591 (18.53 %) procedures. There were 2,355 grade I (16.84 %), 706 grade II (5.05 %), 553 grade III (3.95 %), 7 grade IV (0.05 %), and three death of grade V (0.02 %) complications. This large-scale, contemporary analysis confirms MPCNL is still a safe and efficacious treatment option of kidney stones with a high stone-free rate and uncommon rate of high grade complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616180     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0561-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  13 in total

Review 1.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf; Carol J Bennett; Roger R Dmochowski; Brent K Hollenbeck; Margaret S Pearle; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Felix Wezel; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.

Authors:  Fan Cheng; Weimin Yu; Xiaobin Zhang; Sixing Yang; Yue Xia; Yuan Ruan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Ahmad Enshaei; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Somayeh Khodabakhsh; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Antonello De Lisa; Burak Turna; Jorge Rioja; Helena Walfridsson; Alessandro D'Addessi; Carson Wong; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; Dean Assimos; Mahesh Desai; Jorge Gutierrez; James Lingeman; Roberto Scarpa; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone.

Authors:  Shashikant Mishra; Rajan Sharma; Chandrapraksh Garg; Abraham Kurien; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Mert Ali Karadag; Kadir Tepeler; Erhan Sari; Yalcin Berberoglu; Murat Baykal; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience.

Authors:  Xun Li; Zhaohui He; Kaijun Wu; Shu Keung Li; Guohua Zeng; Jian Yuan; Yongzhong He; Ming Lei
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  19 in total

1.  Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?

Authors:  Ömer Sarılar; Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopçu; Burak Uçpınar; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Metin Savun; Zafer Gökhan Gürbüz; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  A preliminary study: the role of preoperative procalcitonin in predicting postoperative fever after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a negative baseline urine culture.

Authors:  Deng Li; Minglei Sha; Lei Chen; Yinglong Xiao; Jun Lu; Yi Shao
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  In Vivo Evaluation of Chemical Composition of Eight Types of Urinary Calculi Using Spiral Computerized Tomography in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jun Huo; Zhong-Yuan Liu; Ke-Feng Wang; Zhen-Qun Xu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Super-, perfect-, ultra-, micro-, mini-, …: does anybody benefit from miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhu; Jiasheng Li; Zhijian Zhao; Tao Zeng; Chenli Liu; Yang Liu; Jian Yuan; Shaw P Wan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A multicentre retrospective study of transcatheter angiographic embolization in the treatment of delayed haemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Long Li; Yan Zhang; Yong Chen; Kang-Shun Zhu; De-Ji Chen; Xin-Qiao Zeng; Xiao-Bai Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Analysis of repeated renal arteriography after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  He Zhaohui; Lei Hanqi; Lu Xiongbing; Zhang Caixia; Wan Shawpong; Zeng Guohua
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of patients with medullary sponge kidney.

Authors:  Heyang Sun; Ze Zhang; Jian Yuan; Yongda Liu; Ming Lei; Jintai Luo; Shaw P Wan; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The outcome of urine culture positive and culture negative staghorn calculi after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ming Lei; Wei Zhu; Shaw P Wan; Yongda Liu; Guohua Zeng; Jian Yuan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Recent advancement or less invasive treatment of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.