PURPOSE: Three-dimensional dosimetry based on quantitative SPECT/CT has potential advantages over planar approaches, but may be impractical due to acquisition durations. We combine one SPECT/CT with improved quantification of multiple planar scintigraphies to shorten acquisitions. METHODS: A hybrid 2-D/3-D quantification technique is proposed, using SPECT/CT information for robust planar image quantification and creating virtual SPECTs out of conjugate-view planar scintigraphies; these are included in a 3-D absorbed dose calculation. A projection model simulates photon attenuation and scatter as well as camera and collimator effects. Planar and SPECT calibration techniques are described, offering multiple pathways of deriving calibration factors for hybrid quantification. Model, phantom and patient data are used to validate the approach on a per-organ basis, and the similarity of real and virtual SPECTs, and of planar images and virtual SPECT projections, is assessed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Organ overlap, background activity and organ geometry are accounted for in the algorithm. Hybrid time-activity curves yield the same information as those derived from a conventional SPECT evaluation. Where correct values are known, hybrid quantification errors are less than 16% for all but two compartments (SPECT/CT 23%). Under partial volume effects, hybrid quantification can provide more robust results than SPECT/CT. The mean correlation coefficient of 3-D data is 0.962 (2-D 0.934). As a consequence of good activity quantification performance, good agreement of absorbed dose estimates and dose-volume histograms with reference results is achieved. CONCLUSION: The proposed activity quantification method for 2-D scintigraphies can speed up SPECT/CT-based 3-D dosimetry without losing accuracy.
PURPOSE: Three-dimensional dosimetry based on quantitative SPECT/CT has potential advantages over planar approaches, but may be impractical due to acquisition durations. We combine one SPECT/CT with improved quantification of multiple planar scintigraphies to shorten acquisitions. METHODS: A hybrid 2-D/3-D quantification technique is proposed, using SPECT/CT information for robust planar image quantification and creating virtual SPECTs out of conjugate-view planar scintigraphies; these are included in a 3-D absorbed dose calculation. A projection model simulates photon attenuation and scatter as well as camera and collimator effects. Planar and SPECT calibration techniques are described, offering multiple pathways of deriving calibration factors for hybrid quantification. Model, phantom and patient data are used to validate the approach on a per-organ basis, and the similarity of real and virtual SPECTs, and of planar images and virtual SPECT projections, is assessed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Organ overlap, background activity and organ geometry are accounted for in the algorithm. Hybrid time-activity curves yield the same information as those derived from a conventional SPECT evaluation. Where correct values are known, hybrid quantification errors are less than 16% for all but two compartments (SPECT/CT 23%). Under partial volume effects, hybrid quantification can provide more robust results than SPECT/CT. The mean correlation coefficient of 3-D data is 0.962 (2-D 0.934). As a consequence of good activity quantification performance, good agreement of absorbed dose estimates and dose-volume histograms with reference results is achieved. CONCLUSION: The proposed activity quantification method for 2-D scintigraphies can speed up SPECT/CT-based 3-D dosimetry without losing accuracy.
Authors: W E Bolch; L G Bouchet; J S Robertson; B W Wessels; J A Siegel; R W Howell; A K Erdi; B Aydogan; S Costes; E E Watson; A B Brill; N D Charkes; D R Fisher; M T Hays; S R Thomas Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K F Koral; K R Zasadny; M L Kessler; J Q Luo; S F Buchbinder; M S Kaminski; I Francis; R L Wahl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yuni K Dewaraja; Scott J Wilderman; Michael Ljungberg; Kenneth F Koral; Kenneth Zasadny; Mark S Kaminiski Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bin He; Richard L Wahl; George Sgouros; Yong Du; Heather Jacene; Wayne R Kasecamp; Ian Flinn; Richard J Hammes; Jay Bianco; Brad Kahl; Eric C Frey Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Brian E Zimmerman; Darko Grošev; Irène Buvat; Marco A Coca Pérez; Eric C Frey; Alan Green; Anchali Krisanachinda; Michael Lassmann; Michael Ljungberg; Lorena Pozzo; Kamila Afroj Quadir; Mariella A Terán Gretter; Johann Van Staden; Gian Luca Poli Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Elliot Eliyahu Greenblatt; Tilo Winkler; Robert Scott Harris; Vanessa Jane Kelly; Mamary Kone; Jose Venegas Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: Chantal Darquenne; John S Fleming; Ira Katz; Andrew R Martin; Jeffry Schroeter; Omar S Usmani; Jose Venegas; Otmar Schmid Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: Jill Wevrett; Andrew Fenwick; James Scuffham; Lena Johansson; Jonathan Gear; Susanne Schlögl; Marcel Segbers; Katarina Sjögreen-Gleisner; Pavel Solný; Michael Lassmann; Jill Tipping; Andrew Nisbet Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2018-08-02
Authors: Daphne Merel Valerie Huizing; Berlinda Jantina de Wit-van der Veen; Marcel Verheij; Marcellus Petrus Maria Stokkel Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.138