Literature DB >> 27105765

Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study.

Brian E Zimmerman1, Darko Grošev2, Irène Buvat3, Marco A Coca Pérez4, Eric C Frey5, Alan Green6, Anchali Krisanachinda7, Michael Lassmann8, Michael Ljungberg9, Lorena Pozzo10, Kamila Afroj Quadir11, Mariella A Terán Gretter12, Johann Van Staden13, Gian Luca Poli14.   

Abstract

Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing 133Ba, which was chosen as a surrogate for 131I. The sources, with nominal volumes of 2, 4, 6 and 23mL, were calibrated for 133Ba activity by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, but the activity was initially unknown to the participants. Imaging was performed in a cylindrical phantom filled with water. Two trials were carried out in which the participants first estimated the activities using their local standard protocols, and then repeated the measurements using a standardized acquisition and analysis protocol. Finally, processing of the imaging data from the second trial was repeated by a single centre using a fixed protocol. In the first trial, the activities were underestimated by about 15% with planar imaging. SPECT with Chang's first order attenuation correction (Chang-AC) and SPECT-CT overestimated the activity by about 10%. The second trial showed moderate improvements in accuracy and variability. Planar imaging was subject to methodological errors, e.g., in the use of a transmission scan for attenuation correction. The use of Chang-AC was subject to variability from the definition of phantom contours. The project demonstrated the need for training and standardized protocols to achieve good levels of quantitative accuracy and precision in a multicentre setting. Absolute quantification of simple objects with no background was possible with the strictest protocol to about 6% with planar imaging and SPECT (with Chang-AC) and within 2% for SPECT-CT.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparison; SPECT; Vergleichsstudie; planar; quantitative Bildgebung; quantitative imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105765      PMCID: PMC5738655          DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  27 in total

1.  Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Kathy P Willowson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Activity quantification combining conjugate-view planar scintigraphies and SPECT/CT data for patient-specific 3-D dosimetry in radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Andreas Goedicke; Gerrit J Kemerink; Til Aach; Bernd Schweizer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Nuclear medicine dosimetry: quantitative imaging and dose calculations.

Authors:  Gerhard Glatting; Michael Lassmann
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.820

4.  In vivo quantitation of lesion radioactivity using external counting methods.

Authors:  S R Thomas; H R Maxon; J G Kereiakes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A technique for the absolute measurement of activity using a gamma camera and computer.

Authors:  J S Fleming
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Absolute quantitation of radiotracer uptake in the lungs using a gamma camera.

Authors:  D J Macey; R Marshall
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Reproducibility of cerebral blood flow assessment using a quantitative SPECT reconstruction program and split-dose 123I-iodoamphetamine in institutions with different γ-cameras and collimators.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoneda; Satoshi Shirao; Hiroyasu Koizumi; Fumiaki Oka; Hideyuki Ishihara; Kunitsugu Ichiro; Tetsuhiro Kitahara; Hidehiro Iida; Michiyasu Suzuki
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Conjugate view gamma camera method for estimating tumor uptake of iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine.

Authors:  B L Shulkin; J C Sisson; K F Koral; B Shapiro; X H Wang; J Johnson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Iodine biokinetics and dosimetry in radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer: procedures and results of a prospective international controlled study of ablation after rhTSH or hormone withdrawal.

Authors:  Heribert Hänscheid; Michael Lassmann; Markus Luster; Stephen R Thomas; Furio Pacini; Claudia Ceccarelli; Paul W Ladenson; Richard L Wahl; Martin Schlumberger; Marcel Ricard; Al Driedger; Richard T Kloos; Steven I Sherman; Bryan R Haugen; Vincent Carriere; Carine Corone; Christoph Reiners
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Possible Advantages of a Robust Evaluation of Comparisons.

Authors:  J W Müller
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2000-08-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Inter-comparison of quantitative imaging of lutetium-177 (177Lu) in European hospitals.

Authors:  Jill Wevrett; Andrew Fenwick; James Scuffham; Lena Johansson; Jonathan Gear; Susanne Schlögl; Marcel Segbers; Katarina Sjögreen-Gleisner; Pavel Solný; Michael Lassmann; Jill Tipping; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-08-02

2.  Implementation of patient dosimetry in the clinical practice after targeted radiotherapy using [177Lu-[DOTA0, Tyr3]-octreotate.

Authors:  Lore Santoro; Erick Mora-Ramirez; Dorian Trauchessec; Soufiane Chouaf; Pierre Eustache; Jean-Pierre Pouget; Pierre-Olivier Kotzki; Manuel Bardiès; Emmanuel Deshayes
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.138

3.  Recommendations for Multicentre Clinical Trials Involving Dosimetry for Molecular Radiotherapy.

Authors:  J Taprogge; J Wadsley; E Miles; G D Flux
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.126

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.