Literature DB >> 21896660

Practical dosimetry methods for the determination of effective skin and breast dose for a modern CT system, incorporating partial irradiation and prospective cardiac gating.

R J Loader1, O Gosling, C Roobottom, G Morgan-Hughes, N Rowles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For CT coronary angiography (CTCA), a generic chest conversion factor returns a significant underestimate of effective dose. The aim of this manuscript is to communicate new dosimetry methods to calculate weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), effective dose, entrance surface dose (ESD) and organ dose to the breast for prospectively gated CTCA.
METHODS: CTDIw in 32 cm diameter Perspex phantom was measured using an adapted technique, accounting for the segmented scan characteristic. Gafchromic XRCT film (International Speciality Products, New Jersey, NJ) was used to measure the distribution and magnitude of ESD. Breast dose was measured using high sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors and compared to the computer based imaging performance assessment of CT scanners (ImPACT) dosimetry calculations.
RESULTS: For a typical cardiac scan the mean ESD remained broadly constant (7-9 mGy) when averaged over the circumference of the Perspex phantom. Typical absorbed dose to the breast with prospectively gated protocols was within the range 2-15 mGy. The subsequent lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence to the breast was found at 0.01-0.06 for a 20-year-old female. This compares favourably to 100 mGy (LAR ~0.43) for a retrospectively gated CTCA.
CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken when considering radiation dosimetry associated with prospectively gated scanning for CTCA and a method has been conveyed to account for this. Breast doses for prospectively gated CTCA are an order of magnitude lower than retrospectively gated scans. Optimisation of cardiac protocols is expected to show further dose reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21896660      PMCID: PMC3473996          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/22285164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen; Richard Mather; Gregory D N Pearson; Robert L Delapaz; Edward Nickoloff; Ajoy Dutta; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Estimation of organ and effective doses resulting from cone beam CT imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  L J Sawyer; S A Whittle; E S Matthews; H C Starritt; T P Jupp
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.

Authors:  Takao Maruyama; Masanori Takada; Toshiaki Hasuike; Atsushi Yoshikawa; Eiji Namimatsu; Tohru Yoshizumi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  B A Herzog; C A Wyss; L Husmann; O Gaemperli; I Valenta; V Treyer; U Landmesser; P A Kaufmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance.

Authors:  H Scheffel; H Alkadhi; S Leschka; A Plass; L Desbiolles; I Guber; T Krauss; J Gruenenfelder; M Genoni; T F Luescher; B Marincek; P Stolzmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Olivier Adda; Valerie Treyer; Christophe A Wyss; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Fuminari Tatsugami; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Franziska Hermann; Martin Hadamitzky; Markus Krebs; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia McCollough; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Calibration and error analysis of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters for computed tomography radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Peter Prinsen; Jens Wiegert; Elazar-Lars Gerland; Efrat Shefer; Tom Morton; Carla M Thompson; Yoad Yagil; Bin Cheng; Sachin Jambawalikar; Rani Al-Senan; Maxwell Amurao; Sandra S Halliburton; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Patient radiation biological risk in computed tomography angiography procedure.

Authors:  M Alkhorayef; E Babikir; A Alrushoud; H Al-Mohammed; A Sulieman
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  An evaluation of organ dose modulation on a GE optima CT660-computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Matthew T Dixon; Robert J Loader; Gregory C Stevens; Nick P Rowles
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.