R J Loader1, O Gosling, C Roobottom, G Morgan-Hughes, N Rowles. 1. Department of Clinical and Radiation Physics, Directorate of Healthcare Science and Technology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK. robert.loader@nhs.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: For CT coronary angiography (CTCA), a generic chest conversion factor returns a significant underestimate of effective dose. The aim of this manuscript is to communicate new dosimetry methods to calculate weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), effective dose, entrance surface dose (ESD) and organ dose to the breast for prospectively gated CTCA. METHODS: CTDIw in 32 cm diameter Perspex phantom was measured using an adapted technique, accounting for the segmented scan characteristic. Gafchromic XRCT film (International Speciality Products, New Jersey, NJ) was used to measure the distribution and magnitude of ESD. Breast dose was measured using high sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors and compared to the computer based imaging performance assessment of CT scanners (ImPACT) dosimetry calculations. RESULTS: For a typical cardiac scan the mean ESD remained broadly constant (7-9 mGy) when averaged over the circumference of the Perspex phantom. Typical absorbed dose to the breast with prospectively gated protocols was within the range 2-15 mGy. The subsequent lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence to the breast was found at 0.01-0.06 for a 20-year-old female. This compares favourably to 100 mGy (LAR ~0.43) for a retrospectively gated CTCA. CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken when considering radiation dosimetry associated with prospectively gated scanning for CTCA and a method has been conveyed to account for this. Breast doses for prospectively gated CTCA are an order of magnitude lower than retrospectively gated scans. Optimisation of cardiac protocols is expected to show further dose reduction.
OBJECTIVE: For CT coronary angiography (CTCA), a generic chest conversion factor returns a significant underestimate of effective dose. The aim of this manuscript is to communicate new dosimetry methods to calculate weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), effective dose, entrance surface dose (ESD) and organ dose to the breast for prospectively gated CTCA. METHODS: CTDIw in 32 cm diameter Perspex phantom was measured using an adapted technique, accounting for the segmented scan characteristic. Gafchromic XRCT film (International Speciality Products, New Jersey, NJ) was used to measure the distribution and magnitude of ESD. Breast dose was measured using high sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors and compared to the computer based imaging performance assessment of CT scanners (ImPACT) dosimetry calculations. RESULTS: For a typical cardiac scan the mean ESD remained broadly constant (7-9 mGy) when averaged over the circumference of the Perspex phantom. Typical absorbed dose to the breast with prospectively gated protocols was within the range 2-15 mGy. The subsequent lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence to the breast was found at 0.01-0.06 for a 20-year-old female. This compares favourably to 100 mGy (LAR ~0.43) for a retrospectively gated CTCA. CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken when considering radiation dosimetry associated with prospectively gated scanning for CTCA and a method has been conveyed to account for this. Breast doses for prospectively gated CTCA are an order of magnitude lower than retrospectively gated scans. Optimisation of cardiac protocols is expected to show further dose reduction.
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen; Richard Mather; Gregory D N Pearson; Robert L Delapaz; Edward Nickoloff; Ajoy Dutta; David J Brenner Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: B A Herzog; C A Wyss; L Husmann; O Gaemperli; I Valenta; V Treyer; U Landmesser; P A Kaufmann Journal: Heart Date: 2009-07-05 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: H Scheffel; H Alkadhi; S Leschka; A Plass; L Desbiolles; I Guber; T Krauss; J Gruenenfelder; M Genoni; T F Luescher; B Marincek; P Stolzmann Journal: Heart Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Olivier Adda; Valerie Treyer; Christophe A Wyss; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Fuminari Tatsugami; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Franziska Hermann; Martin Hadamitzky; Markus Krebs; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia McCollough; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sigal Trattner; Peter Prinsen; Jens Wiegert; Elazar-Lars Gerland; Efrat Shefer; Tom Morton; Carla M Thompson; Yoad Yagil; Bin Cheng; Sachin Jambawalikar; Rani Al-Senan; Maxwell Amurao; Sandra S Halliburton; Andrew J Einstein Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 4.071