Literature DB >> 21886528

Early Post-operative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in the Presence of a Non-cemented Tapered Wedge Femoral Stem.

H John Cooper1, José A Rodriguez.   

Abstract

Non-cemented femoral fixation in hip arthroplasty has become the standard of practice in the USA. However, recent literature has brought attention to an increasing incidence of periprosthetic femur fractures with certain stem designs. This study examines reasons for early periprosthetic femur fractures in patients with a hip arthroplasty performed using a non-cemented tapered wedge stem design. A multivariate analysis using a matched-cohort design was performed to assess any potential risk factors that may predispose to such fractures. Six of 2,220 hips (0.3%) suffered a periprosthetic femur fracture within the first year after surgery; five of six were Vancouver Type B2. The average time to fracture was 9 weeks. This group of patients had a significantly higher canal-flare index and lower canal-calcar ratio. This complication may be preventable by having a better appreciation of the fit between the implant and the bone during pre-operative planning, with the goal of avoiding a proximal-distal mismatch.

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoral stem; hip arthroplasty; non-cemented; periprosthetic fracture; proximal femoral geometry

Year:  2010        PMID: 21886528      PMCID: PMC2926362          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-010-9161-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  18 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement.

Authors:  O H Brady; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D S Garbuz; C P Duncan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review.

Authors:  Mark I Froimson; Jonathan Garino; Alan Machenaud; J P Vidalain
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

5.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

Authors:  P C Noble; J W Alexander; L J Lindahl; D T Yew; W M Granberry; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

7.  Tapered titanium cementless total hip replacements: a 10- to 13-year followup study.

Authors:  R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; J J Patterson; J Guerin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis.

Authors:  R E Cook; P J Jenkins; P J Walmsley; J T Patton; C M Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Second-generation proximally coated titanium femoral component: minimum 7-year results.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau; Paul Bryant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Loosely implanted cementless stems may become rotationally stable after loading.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; William A Jiranek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  High incidence of stem loosening in association with periprosthetic femur fractures in previously well-fixed cementless grit-blasted tapered-wedge stems.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lim; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Joo-Hyoun Song; Sang-Yeon So; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Peri-prosthetic fractures around tumor endoprostheses: a retrospective analysis of eighteen cases.

Authors:  Nicolas Barut; Philippe Anract; Antoine Babinet; David Biau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Classifications in Brief: The Dorr Classification of Femoral Bone.

Authors:  Jacob Wilkerson; Navin D Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Min-Wook Kim; Young-Yool Chung; Jung-Ho Lee; Ji-Hoon Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Clinical characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhendong Zhang; Qi Zhuo; Wei Chai; Ming Ni; Heng Li; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Comparison of the Incidence of Intra-operative Fractures in Hip Hemi-arthroplasty Performed in Supine and Lateral Positions.

Authors:  Kenta Kamo; Hidehiko Kido; Satoshi Kido
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2019-03-05

8.  Does Proximally Coated Single-Wedge Cementless Stem Work Well in Dorr Type C Femurs? Minimum 10-year Followup.

Authors:  Jung-Taek Kim; Hyung Jun Jeong; Soong Joon Lee; Hee Joong Kim; Jeong Joon Yoo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Periprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Mulford; Ronnie Mathew; David Penn; Alana R Cuthbert; Richard De Steiger
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.025

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.