Literature DB >> 27889052

Types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer survival among women enrolled in Medicaid: A competing-risk model.

Marsha E Samson1, Swann Arp Adams2, Caroline M Mulatya3, Jiajia Zhang3, Charles L Bennett4, James Hebert5, Susan E Steck5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Oral contraceptive pills have been implicated in the pathophysiology of breast cancer. Although many studies have examined the relationship between combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and breast cancer, there is a paucity of literature that discusses progestin-only oral contraceptives (POCs) and breast cancer. The purpose of this investigation is to examine potential associations between different types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer mortality in the South Carolina Medicaid population among different racial/ethnic groups.
METHODS: Subjects included 4816 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated to determine time-to-mortality rates among users of oral contraceptives. Competing-risks models and Cox multivariate survival models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer and other-cause mortality, as well as all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: POCs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.52) and a non-significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52, 2.07). COCs increased the risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.28) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.57).
CONCLUSION: Use of POCs may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer mortality. Due to the small sample size of POC users in the current study, additional research is needed to confirm these findings. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Competing risk; Health disparities; Oral contraceptives; Progestin; Survival analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889052      PMCID: PMC5367152          DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

Review 1.  Bias in the evaluation of low-magnitude associations: an empirical perspective.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Progestogen-only pills and high blood pressure: is there an association? A literature review.

Authors:  Sabina F Hussain
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Using directed acyclic graphs to guide analyses of neighbourhood health effects: an introduction.

Authors:  N L Fleischer; A V Diez Roux
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams.

Authors:  Johannes Textor; Juliane Hardt; Sven Knüppel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Cardiovascular disease incidence among females in South Carolina by type of oral contraceptives, 2000-2013: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Swann A Adams; Anwar T Merchant; Whitney D Maxwell; Jiajia Zhang; Charles L Bennett; James R Hebert
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Applying Cox regression to competing risks.

Authors:  M Lunn; D McNeil
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study.

Authors:  Merethe Kumle; Elisabete Weiderpass; Tonje Braaten; Ingemar Persson; Hans-Olov Adami; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: differences by race and education.

Authors:  Krystale E Littlejohn
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

Review 9.  Progestin and breast cancer risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marsha Samson; Nancy Porter; Olubunmi Orekoya; James R Hebert; Swann Arp Adams; Charles L Bennett; Susan E Steck
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Breast cancer and the pill.

Authors:  A A Kubba
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Association of Combined Estrogen-Progestogen and Progestogen-Only Contraceptives with the Development of Cancer.

Authors:  William V Williams; Louise A Mitchell; S Kathleen Carlson; Kathleen M Raviele
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-01-03

2.  Stellate cells and mesenchymal stem cells in benign mammary stroma are associated with risk factors for breast cancer - an observational study.

Authors:  Björn Logi Isfoss; Bo Holmqvist; Elin Sand; Johan Forsell; Helena Jernström; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  A prospective investigation of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer mortality: findings from the Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort.

Authors:  Ula Nur; Darline El Reda; Dana Hashim; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.