Literature DB >> 30576664

Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Rebecca G Simmons1, Jessica N Sanders2, Claudia Geist3, Lori Gawron2, Kyl Myers2, David K Turok2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nearly half of women will switch or discontinue using their selected contraceptive method in the first year. Research on early switching or discontinuation provides important clinical and public health insights, although few studies have assessed associated factors, particularly among longitudinal cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: The current study explores attributes associated with early contraceptive method switching or discontinuation (<6 months of initiation) among participants enrolled in the intervention cohorts of the Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative (Utah, United States).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake participants have access to no-cost contraception for 3 years. This includes both the initial selection and the ability to switch or to discontinue methods without cost. Methods available included the following: nonhormonal behavioral methods (male/female condoms, withdrawal, diaphragms, cervical caps, and fertility awareness); short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, and injectable); and long-acting methods (intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants). Participants completed surveys at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. We collected data on participant demographics, contraceptive continuation, switching, and discontinuation, as well as factors associated with these changes, including established measures of pregnancy intention and ambivalence and reasons for switching or discontinuing. We conducted descriptive statistics, univariable, and multivariable Poisson regression analyses to assess predictors of both discontinuation and switching. We also conducted χ2 analyses to compare reported reasons for stopping between switchers and discontinuers.
RESULTS: At 6 months, 2,583 women (70.0%) reported continuation of their baseline method, 367 (10%) reported at least 1 period of discontinuation, 459 (12.4%) reported switching to a different method, and 279 (7.6%) did not provide 6-month follow-up. Factors associated with discontinuation included selection of a short-acting method (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97, 3.12), report of Hispanic ethnicity (IRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12, 1.89) and nonwhite race (IRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08, 2.02), and having any future pregnancy plans, even years out. Participants with some college education were less likely to report discontinuation (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57, 0.94). Selecting a short-acting method at baseline was also associated with increased likelihood of method switching (IRR, 2.29, 95% CI, 1.87, 2.80), as was having 2 or more children (IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.74). Women were less likely to switch if they were on their parents' insurance (IRR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56, 0.99). Among participants who switched methods, 36.9% switched to a long-acting reversible method, 31.7% switched to a short-acting hormonal method, and 31.1% switched to a nonhormonal behavioral method, such as condom use. Of participants providing a reason for stopping, 454 women (73.2%) reported side effects as 1 reason for switching or discontinuing their initial method.
CONCLUSION: Early contraceptive method switching and discontinuation are frequent outcomes of contraceptive use. These changes are common even with removal of contraceptive access barriers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States; contraception; discontinuation; family planning; switching

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30576664      PMCID: PMC6861011          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  25 in total

1.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

2.  Contraceptive Method Use During the Community-Wide HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Kyl Myers; Lori M Gawron; Rebecca G Simmons; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Beyond intent: exploring the association of contraceptive choice with questions about Pregnancy Attitudes, Timing and How important is pregnancy prevention (PATH) questions.

Authors:  Claudia Geist; Abigail Ra Aiken; Jessica N Sanders; Bethany G Everett; Kyl Myers; Patty Cason; Rebecca G Simmons; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Renee D Kramer; Jenny A Higgins; Amy L Godecker; Deborah B Ehrenthal
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  What differentiates method stoppers from switchers? Contraceptive discontinuation and switching among Honduran women.

Authors:  Janine Barden-O'Fallon; Ilene Speizer
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-03

6.  Decreasing Unintended Pregnancy: Opportunities Created by the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Jared Fox; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Racial Differences in Pregnancy Intention, Reproductive Coercion, and Partner Violence among Family Planning Clients: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Charvonne N Holliday; Elizabeth Miller; Michele R Decker; Jessica G Burke; Patricia I Documet; Sonya B Borrero; Jay G Silverman; Daniel J Tancredi; Edmund Ricci; Heather L McCauley
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-04-07

8.  Is Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Increasing? Assessing Trends Among U.S. College Women, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Rachel G Logan; Erika L Thompson; Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Ellen M Daley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

9.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zoran Bursac; C Heath Gauss; David Keith Williams; David W Hosmer
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2008-12-16

10.  Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X-Funded Facilities in 2016.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Mia R Zolna; Kristen L Burke
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-12
View more
  14 in total

1.  "Shared risk": Reframing risk analysis in the ethics of novel male contraceptives.

Authors:  Georgina D Campelia; Carmen Abbe; Logan M Nickels; Evy McElmeel; John K Amory
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  The relationship between hormonal contraception and cervical dysplasia/cancer controlling for human papillomavirus infection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Elle Anastasiou; Katharine J McCarthy; Erica L Gollub; Lauren Ralph; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert; Heidi E Jones
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Discontinuation of hormonal contraception due to changes in mood and decreases in sexual desire: the role of adverse childhood experiences.

Authors:  Andrew M Novick; Rachel L Johnson; Aaron Lazorwitz; Anna Belyavskaya; Lily Berkowitz; Aileen Norton; Mary D Sammel; C Neill Epperson
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.752

4.  Discontinuation rates of different contraceptive methods in Thai women up to 1-year after method initiation.

Authors:  Unnop Jaisamrarn; Monchai Santipap; Somsook Santibenchakul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Provision of family planning vouchers and early initiation of postpartum contraceptive use among women living with HIV in southwestern Uganda: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther C Atukunda; Godfrey R Mugyenyi; Celestino Obua; Elly B Atuhumuza; Edward J Lukyamuzi; Angela Kaida; Amon G Agaba; Lynn T Matthews
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Beyond safety and efficacy: sexuality-related priorities and their associations with contraceptive method selection.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Kelsey Q Wright; David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-08-19

7.  A qualitative exploration of contraceptive use and discontinuation among women with an unmet need for modern contraception in Kenya.

Authors:  Susan Ontiri; Lilian Mutea; Violet Naanyu; Mark Kabue; Regien Biesma; Jelle Stekelenburg
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Women's Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Birth Timing and Birth Stopping.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Michael S Rendall; Polina Zvavitch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-08-01

9.  Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Alison B Comfort; Maya Blum; Corinne H Rocca; Charles E McCulloch; Lavanya Rao; Nishant Shah; Helen Oquendo Del Toro; Suzan Goodman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.637

10.  Final Program Data and Factors Associated With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Removal: The Zika Contraception Access Network.

Authors:  Eva Lathrop; Stacey Hurst; Zipatly Mendoza; Lauren B Zapata; Pierina Cordero; Rachel Powell; Caitlin Green; Nilda Moreno; Denise J Jamieson; Lisa Romero
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.