Literature DB >> 9258648

Urban adolescent females' views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: a double paradox.

H Kuiper1, S Miller, E Martinez, L Loeb, P Darney.   

Abstract

Focus groups and in-depth interviews were used to explore the decline in popularity of the contraceptive implant in a clinic-based sample of 41 ethnically diverse, urban, sexually active adolescents. While these teenagers' socioeconomic status and patterns of inconsistent contraceptive use made them potentially ideal implant recipients, they were unlikely to select this method. Negative media reports about the method were less influential than social conditions such as peer perspectives and gender relations. Oral networks that propagated misinformation went unchallenged because of the silence of satisfied users. Personal factors such as future orientation, autonomous decision-making and value of control also influenced contraceptive decision-making.

Keywords:  Adolescents; Adolescents, Female; Age Factors; Americas; Attitude; Behavior; California; Communication; Contraception; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Knowledge Sources; Misinformation; North America; Northern America; Perception; Population; Population Characteristics; Psychological Factors; Psychosocial Factors; Research Report; United States; Urban Population--women; Youth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  8 in total

1.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

2.  What Women Want: A Qualitative Study of Contraception in Jail.

Authors:  Dana Schonberg; Ariana H Bennett; Carolyn Sufrin; Alison Karasz; Marji Gold
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Family discussions about contraception and family planning: a qualitative exploration of black parent and adolescent perspectives.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Sonya Borrero; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-09

5.  Barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females and their interest in an emergency department based intervention.

Authors:  Lauren S Chernick; Rebecca Schnall; Tracy Higgins; Melissa S Stockwell; Paula M Castaño; John Santelli; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Marisa Felsher; Faye Korich; Amanda M Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in internet use for seeking health information among young women.

Authors:  Tabassum H Laz; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-11-06

8.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.