Literature DB >> 21884346

Prognostic significance of recurrent grade 1B rejection in the first year after pediatric cardiac transplantation: a case for reinstatement of the 1B rejection grade.

Brian Feingold1, Claire Irving, Gregory H Tatum, Steven A Webber.   

Abstract

The 2005 ISHLT rejection grading system merged grades 1A, 1B, and 2 into a single grade (1R) assuming equivalent prognostic significance. We hypothesized that recurrent 1B ACR is associated with adverse outcomes. Data on all heart transplant recipients at our center from 1990 to 2007 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had more than one grade ≥ 3A/2R biopsy in the first six wk or any grade ≥ 3A/2R biopsies during the first year thereafter. Patients with ≥ 2 grade 1B biopsies from six wk to one yr were classified as "recurrent 1B." Outcomes were freedom from late (greater than one yr) ACR (grade ≥ 3A/2R), CAD, retransplantation/death, and a composite end-point. Sixty-two patients (53 non-recurrent 1B, nine recurrent 1B) met inclusion criteria. In univariate analyses, recurrent 1B status was associated with decreased freedom from late ACR (p < 0.001), CAD (p = 0.004), and the composite outcome (p < 0.001). There was no difference in freedom from retransplantation/death (p = 0.48). After controlling for demographic differences between the groups, recurrent 1B status was independently associated with late ACR (HR 5.90; p = 0.002) and the composite outcome (HR 4.52; p = 0.002). These data suggest that further study of the impact of removal of the 1B classification from the ISHLT grading scheme is warranted.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884346      PMCID: PMC3172690          DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01530.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  15 in total

Review 1.  The pathology of heart transplant biopsy specimens: revisiting the 1990 ISHLT working formulation.

Authors:  E Rene Rodriguez
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Evolution of untreated mild rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  J J Lloveras; G Escourrou; M B Delisle; G Fournial; A Cerene; I Bassanetti; D Durand
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  M E Billingham; N R Cary; M E Hammond; J Kemnitz; C Marboe; H A McCallister; D C Snovar; G L Winters; A Zerbe
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

4.  Natural course of moderate cardiac allograft rejection (International Society for Heart Transplantation grade 2) early and late after transplantation.

Authors:  H P Brunner-La Rocca; G Sütsch; J Schneider; F Follath; W Kiowski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Evolution of focal moderate (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2) rejection of the cardiac allograft.

Authors:  A Milano; A L Caforio; U Livi; B Bauce; A Angelini; D Casarotto; G Thiene
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Repetitive nontreated episodes of grade 1B or 2 acute rejection impair long-term cardiac graft function.

Authors:  M Anguita; F López-Rubio; J M Arizón; J M Latre; J Casares; A López-Granados; D Mesa; D Giménez; F Torres; M Concha
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Acute rejection: significance of elapsed time after transplantation.

Authors:  M N Rizeq; M A Masek; M E Billingham
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Natural history of focal moderate cardiac allograft rejection. Is treatment warranted?

Authors:  G L Winters; E Loh; F J Schoen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Consistencies and controversies in the application of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation for heart transplant biopsy specimens. Rapamycin Cardiac Rejection Treatment Trial Pathologists.

Authors:  G L Winters; B M McManus
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Late rejection episodes more than 1 year after pediatric heart transplantation: risk factors and outcomes.

Authors:  Steven A Webber; David C Naftel; James Parker; Neda Mulla; Ian Balfour; James K Kirklin; Robert Morrow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  2 in total

1.  Left ventricular myocardial performance index change for detection of acute cellular rejection in pediatric heart transplantation.

Authors:  Ryan Flanagan; Nicole Cain; Gregory H Tatum; Mark G Debrunner; Stacey Drant; Brian Feingold
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2013-09-30

2.  Cell-free DNA donor fraction analysis in pediatric and adult heart transplant patients by multiplexed allele-specific quantitative PCR: Validation of a rapid and highly sensitive clinical test for stratification of rejection probability.

Authors:  Paula E North; Emily Ziegler; Donna K Mahnke; Karl D Stamm; Angela Thomm; Paul Daft; Mary Goetsch; Huan Ling Liang; Maria Angeles Baker; Adam Vepraskas; Chris Rosenau; Mahua Dasgupta; Pippa Simpson; Michael E Mitchell; Aoy Tomita-Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.