Literature DB >> 1498143

Evolution of untreated mild rejection in heart transplant recipients.

J J Lloveras1, G Escourrou, M B Delisle, G Fournial, A Cerene, I Bassanetti, D Durand.   

Abstract

To elucidate whether mild rejection requires treatment, we retrospectively examined the spontaneous natural history of this histologic feature without an increase of immunosuppression. During a 4-year period, 55 heart transplantations were performed in 54 patients on whom 958 endomyocardial biopsies were performed. Among these biopsies, 162 specimens showed features of mild rejection. We studied the results of subsequent biopsies performed 7 to 10 days later, without any change in immunosuppression. These revealed regression of lesions to minimal rejection in 51 cases (31%), the same histologic feature in 82 cases (51%), or progression to moderate or severe rejection in 29 cases (18%). In 82% of these cases, therefore, no aggravation of histologic feature was observed. We separated the cases in which current-study biopsies showed mild rejection into three groups according to the result of the most recent biopsy, that is, minimal, mild, or moderate-severe rejection. The percentage of good outcome was not modified by the nature of the previous biopsy specimen: 84%, if minimal rejection was preceding the study biopsy; 82%, in the cases of mild rejection; and 77%, for moderate or severe rejection. We did not find significant differences in this evolution between patients with fewer or more than two moderate or severe acute rejections in the first 4-month period after heart transplantation (respectively, 15% or 24% progression to moderate or severe acute rejection after nontreated mild rejection).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1498143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of recurrent grade 1B rejection in the first year after pediatric cardiac transplantation: a case for reinstatement of the 1B rejection grade.

Authors:  Brian Feingold; Claire Irving; Gregory H Tatum; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-09

2.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for cardiac allograft rejection: the Sheffield experience.

Authors:  S K Suvarna; A Kennedy; F Ciulli; T J Locke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Conservative management of late rejection after heart transplantation: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  J R Doty; P L Walinsky; J D Salazar; D E Alejo; P S Greene; W A Baumgartner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Treatment of Recurrent Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder with Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplant.

Authors:  Bharat Malhotra; Ahmad K Rahal; Hussam Farhoud; Dennis F Moore; K James Kallail
Journal:  Case Rep Transplant       Date:  2015-11-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.