BACKGROUND: The significance of International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grade 2 cardiac allograft rejection has been questioned, and the medical community is not in complete agreement as to its clinical management. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the follow-up of all available endomyocardial biopsy samples obtained from 161 transplant patients since introduction of the ISHT nomenclature at our institution. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 2868 biopsies performed 3 days to 8.9 years after transplantation, 420 biopsies had no follow-up or were preceded by intensified immunosuppression and were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 2448 biopsies, 374 (15.3%) were repeat biopsies performed 7 to 10 days after prior ISHT 2 rejection without change of treatment. Of these, 70 (18.7%) had progressed to > or = ISHT 3A, whereas 82 (21.9%) remained unchanged and 222 (59.4%) resolved. In contrast, follow-up of 2074 biopsies with lower-grade rejection showed graft rejection classified as > or = ISHT 3A in 153 (7.4%), ISHT 2 in 240 (11.6%), and < or = ISHT 1B in 1681 (81.1%) biopsy samples (P < .0001). In univariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) of graft rejection > or = ISHT 3A after ISHT 2 rejection was 2.89. Other univariate predictors of rejection > or = ISHT 3A were time after transplantation (OR = 0.96 per month, P < .0001), blood group type B (OR = 1.62, P < .005), "Quilty" lesion on previous biopsy (OR = 1.70, P < .005), number of HLA mismatches (OR = 1.27 per mismatch, P < .005), female sex (OR = 1.55, P < .05), and serum creatinine level (OR = 0.93 per 10 mumol/L, P < .005). Young age of recipients was a risk factor during long-term (> or = 2 years) follow-up (P < .002), and lower cyclosporine level was a risk factor during the first month after transplantation (P < .01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ISHT 2 rejection on previous biopsy remained the strongest predictor of rejection > or = ISHT 3A (OR = 2.40, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Several factors independently increase the risk of rejection classified as > or = ISHT 3A. The strongest predictor of a grade of > or = ISHT 3A was ISHT 2 rejection on the previous biopsy obtained 7 to 10 days earlier. Therefore, ISHT 2 graft rejection is of clinical significance, and short-term follow-up appears to be warranted even late after transplantation.
BACKGROUND: The significance of International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grade 2 cardiac allograft rejection has been questioned, and the medical community is not in complete agreement as to its clinical management. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the follow-up of all available endomyocardial biopsy samples obtained from 161 transplant patients since introduction of the ISHT nomenclature at our institution. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 2868 biopsies performed 3 days to 8.9 years after transplantation, 420 biopsies had no follow-up or were preceded by intensified immunosuppression and were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 2448 biopsies, 374 (15.3%) were repeat biopsies performed 7 to 10 days after prior ISHT 2 rejection without change of treatment. Of these, 70 (18.7%) had progressed to > or = ISHT 3A, whereas 82 (21.9%) remained unchanged and 222 (59.4%) resolved. In contrast, follow-up of 2074 biopsies with lower-grade rejection showed graft rejection classified as > or = ISHT 3A in 153 (7.4%), ISHT 2 in 240 (11.6%), and < or = ISHT 1B in 1681 (81.1%) biopsy samples (P < .0001). In univariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) of graft rejection > or = ISHT 3A after ISHT 2 rejection was 2.89. Other univariate predictors of rejection > or = ISHT 3A were time after transplantation (OR = 0.96 per month, P < .0001), blood group type B (OR = 1.62, P < .005), "Quilty" lesion on previous biopsy (OR = 1.70, P < .005), number of HLA mismatches (OR = 1.27 per mismatch, P < .005), female sex (OR = 1.55, P < .05), and serum creatinine level (OR = 0.93 per 10 mumol/L, P < .005). Young age of recipients was a risk factor during long-term (> or = 2 years) follow-up (P < .002), and lower cyclosporine level was a risk factor during the first month after transplantation (P < .01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ISHT 2 rejection on previous biopsy remained the strongest predictor of rejection > or = ISHT 3A (OR = 2.40, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Several factors independently increase the risk of rejection classified as > or = ISHT 3A. The strongest predictor of a grade of > or = ISHT 3A was ISHT 2 rejection on the previous biopsy obtained 7 to 10 days earlier. Therefore, ISHT 2 graft rejection is of clinical significance, and short-term follow-up appears to be warranted even late after transplantation.
Authors: Ryan S Dolan; Amir A Rahsepar; Julie Blaisdell; Kenichiro Suwa; Kambiz Ghafourian; Jane E Wilcox; Sadiya S Khan; Esther E Vorovich; Jonathan D Rich; Allen S Anderson; Clyde W Yancy; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-03-13