Literature DB >> 7895355

Natural history of focal moderate cardiac allograft rejection. Is treatment warranted?

G L Winters1, E Loh, F J Schoen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of progression and potential long-term consequences of isolated foci of moderate acute rejection (FMR) on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) have not been defined; therefore, whether FMR necessitates augmented immunosuppression remains controversial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: At our institution, recipients with EMBs having FMR, defined as one or two isolated foci of cellular infiltrates with associated myocyte damage (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] grade 2 and a subset of grade 3A), do not routinely receive intensified immunosuppression. Accordingly, to determine the outcome of untreated FMR, we reviewed 4398 EMBs (mean, 4.4 samples each) obtained after orthotopic heart transplantation in 208 consecutive recipients maintained on triple immunosuppressive therapy. The incidence of progression versus resolution of FMR, the time interval after transplantation when FMR was detected, and the relation of untreated FMR to recipient survival were analyzed. FMR categorized as one (n = 312) or two (n = 89) foci was present in 401 EMBs (9% of total) obtained 10 days to 7.5 years after transplantation from 149 recipients (72%). EMBs with FMR resolved without treatment in 341 of 401 (85%), and only 60 of 401 (15%) progressed to higher grade rejection. EMBs that progressed occurred 7.5 +/- 7.9 months (mean +/- SD) after transplantation compared with 14.0 +/- 16.5 months after transplantation for those that resolved (P < .005). Of the 60 EMBs that progressed, 55% occurred within the first 6 months, 78% within the first year, and 97% within the first 2 years after transplantation. EMBs with two foci of FMR were no more likely to progress than those with one focus. Thirty-nine recipients experienced one (n = 25), two (n = 9), three (n = 3), or four (n = 2) episodes of FMR that progressed. One or more episodes of FMR that did not progress occurred in 110 recipients. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival at 1 and 5 years was similar in recipients with and those without FMR progression.
CONCLUSIONS: First, untreated FMR consisting of either one or two foci has a low rate of progression. Second, progression of FMR decreases with increasing postoperative interval and becomes rare after 2 years. Last, FMR progression did not identify recipients with decreased survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7895355     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of recurrent grade 1B rejection in the first year after pediatric cardiac transplantation: a case for reinstatement of the 1B rejection grade.

Authors:  Brian Feingold; Claire Irving; Gregory H Tatum; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-09

2.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for cardiac allograft rejection: the Sheffield experience.

Authors:  S K Suvarna; A Kennedy; F Ciulli; T J Locke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Utility of heart biopsy in transplant patients.

Authors:  E N Beckman; M R Mehra; M H Park; R L Scott
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2001-10

4.  Effect of adopting a new histological grading system of acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  A H Balk; P E Zondervan; P van der Meer; T van Gelder; B Mochtar; M L Simoons; W Weimar
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Diagnostic performance of multisequential cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Andrew J Taylor; Gautam Vaddadi; Heinz Pfluger; Michelle Butler; Peter Bergin; Angeline Leet; Meroula Richardson; Joshi Cherayath; Leah Iles; David M Kaye
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Right ventricular expression of extracellular matrix proteins, matrix-metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors over a period of 3 years after heart transplantation.

Authors:  D J Schupp; B P Huck; J Sykora; C Flechtenmacher; M Gorenflo; A Koch; F-U Sack; M Haass; H A Katus; H E Ulmer; S Hagl; H F Otto; P A Schnabel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Conservative management of late rejection after heart transplantation: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  J R Doty; P L Walinsky; J D Salazar; D E Alejo; P S Greene; W A Baumgartner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Treatment of Recurrent Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder with Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplant.

Authors:  Bharat Malhotra; Ahmad K Rahal; Hussam Farhoud; Dennis F Moore; K James Kallail
Journal:  Case Rep Transplant       Date:  2015-11-25

9.  Diagnostic performance of late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Evrim Şimşek; Sanem Nalbantgil; Naim Ceylan; Mehdi Zoghi; Hatice Soner Kemal; Çağatay Engin; Tahir Yağdı; Mustafa Özbaran
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.596

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.