Literature DB >> 12531408

The pathology of heart transplant biopsy specimens: revisiting the 1990 ISHLT working formulation.

E Rene Rodriguez1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12531408     DOI： 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00575-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN： 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Noninvasive prediction of the exercise-induced elevation in left ventricular filling pressure in post-heart transplant patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jaroslav Meluzin; Petr Hude; Jan Krejci; Lenka Spinarova; Helena Podrouzkova; Pavel Leinveber; Ladislav Dusek; Vladimir Soska; Josef Tomandl; Petr Nemec
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

2.  Prognostic significance of recurrent grade 1B rejection in the first year after pediatric cardiac transplantation: a case for reinstatement of the 1B rejection grade.

Authors:  Brian Feingold; Claire Irving; Gregory H Tatum; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-09

3.  Antibody-mediated rejection in human cardiac allografts: evaluation of immunoglobulins and complement activation products C4d and C3d as markers.

Authors:  E R Rodriguez; Diane V Skojec; Carmela D Tan; Andrea A Zachary; Edward K Kasper; John V Conte; William M Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Amiodarone use in patients listed for heart transplant is associated with increased 1-year post-transplant mortality.

Authors:  Lauren B Cooper; Robert J Mentz; Leah B Edwards; Amber R Wilk; Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Carmelo A Milano; Adrian F Hernandez; Josef Stehlik; Lars H Lund
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Divergent role of donor dendritic cells in rejection versus tolerance of allografts.

Authors:  Takuya Ueno; Katsunori Tanaka; Mollie Jurewicz; Takaya Murayama; Indira Guleria; Paolo Fiorina; Jesus C Paez; Andrea Augello; Andrea Vergani; Masie Wong; R Neal Smith; Reza Abdi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  An automated computational image analysis pipeline for histological grading of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Eliot G Peyster; Sara Arabyarmohammadi; Andrew Janowczyk; Sepideh Azarianpour-Esfahani; Miroslav Sekulic; Clarissa Cassol; Luke Blower; Anil Parwani; Priti Lal; Michael D Feldman; Kenneth B Margulies; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 35.855

7.  Significance and suppression of redundant IL17 responses in acute allograft rejection by bioinformatics based drug repositioning of fenofibrate.

Authors:  Silke Roedder; Naoyuki Kimura; Homare Okamura; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Yongquan Gong; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Drawing networks of rejection - a systems biological approach to the identification of candidate genes in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Martin Cadeiras; Manuel von Bayern; Anshu Sinha; Khurram Shahzad; Farhana Latif; Wei Keat Lim; Hernan Grenett; Esteban Tabak; Tod Klingler; Andrea Califano; Mario C Deng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Heart Transplantation and Risk of Cardiac Vasculopathy Development: What Factors Are Important?

Authors:  Małgorzata Sobieszczańska-Małek; Jerzy Korewicki; Krzysztof Komuda; Małgorzata Karczmarz; Sylwia Szymańska; Alicja Cicha-Mikołajczyk; Paweł Bekta; Adam Parulski; Maciej Pronicki; Wiesława Grajkowska; Grzegorz Małek; Przemysław Leszek; Maria Kaczorowska; Mariusz Kuśmierczyk; Tomasz Zieliński
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 10.  Advanced Morphologic Analysis for Diagnosing Allograft Rejection: The Case of Cardiac Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Eliot G Peyster; Anant Madabhushi; Kenneth B Margulies
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.939
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.