OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of vascularity of renal masses in patients with impaired renal function. METHODS: Between May 2007 and November 2008, 11/67 consecutive patients referred for MRI evaluation of a renal mass underwent unenhanced ASL-MRI due to moderate-to-severe chronic or acute renal failure. Mean blood flow in vascularised and non-vascularised lesions and the relation between blood flow and final diagnosis of malignancy were correlated with a 2-sided homogeneous variance t-test and the Fisher Exact Test, respectively. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seventeen renal lesions were evaluated in 11 patients (8 male; mean age = 70 years) (range 57-86). The median eGFR was 24 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range 7-39). The average blood flow of 11 renal masses interpreted as ASL-positive (134 +/- 85.7 mL/100 g/min) was higher than that of 6 renal masses interpreted as ASL-negative (20.5 +/- 8.1 mL/100 g/min)(p = 0.015). ASL-positivity correlated with malignancy (n = 3) or epithelial atypia (n = 1) at histopathology or progression at follow up (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: ASL detection of vascularity in renal masses in patients with impaired renal function is feasible and seems to indicate neoplasia although the technique requires further evaluation. KEY POINTS: Arterial spin labeling may help to characterise renal masses in patients with renal failure Detection of blood flow on ASL in a renal mass supports the presence of a neoplasm Renal masses with high blood-flow levels on ASL seem to progress rapidly.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of vascularity of renal masses in patients with impaired renal function. METHODS: Between May 2007 and November 2008, 11/67 consecutive patients referred for MRI evaluation of a renal mass underwent unenhanced ASL-MRI due to moderate-to-severe chronic or acute renal failure. Mean blood flow in vascularised and non-vascularised lesions and the relation between blood flow and final diagnosis of malignancy were correlated with a 2-sided homogeneous variance t-test and the Fisher Exact Test, respectively. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seventeen renal lesions were evaluated in 11 patients (8 male; mean age = 70 years) (range 57-86). The median eGFR was 24 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range 7-39). The average blood flow of 11 renal masses interpreted as ASL-positive (134 +/- 85.7 mL/100 g/min) was higher than that of 6 renal masses interpreted as ASL-negative (20.5 +/- 8.1 mL/100 g/min)(p = 0.015). ASL-positivity correlated with malignancy (n = 3) or epithelial atypia (n = 1) at histopathology or progression at follow up (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: ASL detection of vascularity in renal masses in patients with impaired renal function is feasible and seems to indicate neoplasia although the technique requires further evaluation. KEY POINTS: Arterial spin labeling may help to characterise renal masses in patients with renal failure Detection of blood flow on ASL in a renal mass supports the presence of a neoplasm Renal masses with high blood-flow levels on ASL seem to progress rapidly.
Authors: Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Cedric de Bazelaire; David C Alsop; Daniel George; Ivan Pedrosa; Yongyu Wang; M Dror Michaelson; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Philip M Robson; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Weiying Dai; Ivan Pedrosa; Neil M Rofsky; David C Alsop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Rachel Schor-Bardach; David C Alsop; Ivan Pedrosa; Stephanie A Solazzo; Xiaoen Wang; Robert P Marquis; Michael B Atkins; Meredith Regan; Sabina Signoretti; Robert E Lenkinski; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Massimo Galia; Domenico Albano; Alberto Bruno; Antonino Agrusa; Giorgio Romano; Giuseppe Di Buono; Francesco Agnello; Giuseppe Salvaggio; Ludovico La Grutta; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Felix Pierre Kuhn; Florian Wiesinger; Gaspar Delso; Gustav von Schulthess Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Rotem S Lanzman; Phil M Robson; Maryellen R Sun; Amish D Patel; Kimiknu Mentore; Andrew A Wagner; Elizabeth M Genega; Neil M Rofsky; David C Alsop; Ivan Pedrosa Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Philip M Robson; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Martin P Smith; Maryellen R M Sun; Weiying Dai; Neil M Rofsky; Ivan Pedrosa; David C Alsop Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 3.173