Literature DB >> 17899106

MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation.

Ivan Pedrosa1, Mary T Chou, Long Ngo, Ronaldo H Baroni, Elizabeth M Genega, Laura Galaburda, William C DeWolf, Neil M Rofsky.   

Abstract

To perform a feature analysis of malignant renal tumors evaluated with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to investigate the correlation between MR imaging features and histopathological findings. MR examinations in 79 malignant renal masses were retrospectively evaluated, and a feature analysis was performed. Each renal mass was assigned to one of eight categories from a proposed MRI classification system. The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI classification system to predict the histologic subtype and nuclear grade was calculated. Subvoxel fat on chemical shift imaging correlated to clear cell type (p < 0.05); sensitivity = 42%, specificity = 100%. Large size, intratumoral necrosis, retroperitoneal vascular collaterals, and renal vein thrombosis predicted high-grade clear cell type (p < 0.05). Small size, peripheral location, low intratumoral SI on T2-weighted images, and low-level enhancement were associated with low-grade papillary carcinomas (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI classification system for diagnosing low grade clear cell, high-grade clear cell, all clear cell, all papillary, and transitional carcinomas were 50% and 94%, 93% and 75%, 92% and 83%, 80% and 94%, and 100% and 99%, respectively. The MRI feature analysis and proposed classification system help predict the histological type and nuclear grade of renal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899106     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0757-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  40 in total

Review 1.  HIF-1 and human disease: one highly involved factor.

Authors:  G L Semenza
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention.

Authors:  Erik Kouba; Angela Smith; Daniel McRackan; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gordana Djordjevic; Vladimir Mozetic; Danijela Vrdoljak Mozetic; Vanja Licul; Koviljka Matusan Ilijas; Elvira Mustac; Romano Oguic; Zeljko Fuckar; Nives Jonjic
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Fat poor renal angiomyolipoma: patient, computerized tomography and histological findings.

Authors:  John Milner; Brian McNeil; Joe Alioto; Kevin Proud; Tara Rubinas; Maria Picken; Terrence Demos; Thomas Turk; Kent T Perry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Soo Hyun Kim; Yoon Jin Jang; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Hyungkeun Park; Jun Woo Lee; Suk Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas.

Authors:  Gary M Israel; Nicole Hindman; Elizabeth Hecht; Glenn Krinsky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Jayson; H Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature.

Authors:  Sam N Chawla; Paul L Crispen; Alexandra L Hanlon; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene and kidney cancer.

Authors:  William G Kaelin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The current radiological approach to renal cysts.

Authors:  M A Bosniak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Imaging renal cell carcinoma with ultrasonography, CT and MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Peter J Bostrom; George Koulouris; Antonio Finelli; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Imaging angiogenesis of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Ying-Kiat Zee; James P B O'Connor; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson; Andrew R Clamp; M Ben Taylor; Noel W Clarke; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  [Tumours of the Kidney: CT vs. MRI. Nearly equal alternatives with minor differences].

Authors:  J Huber; P Hallscheidt; N Wagener; S Pahernik; A Haferkamp; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Imaging Protocols for Active Surveillance in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christine W Liaw; Jared S Winoker; Reza Mehrazin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of a Standardized MR Imaging Approach in the Prediction of Small Renal Mass Histology.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Noah E Canvasser; Yin Xi; Daniella F Pinho; Daniel N Costa; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Gaurav Khatri; John R Leyendecker; Takeshi Yokoo; Aaron H Lay; Nicholas Kavoussi; Ersin Koseoglu; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnostic performance of prospectively assigned clear cell Likelihood scores (ccLS) in small renal masses at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Sandy Kim; Ryan L Steinberg; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Ivan Pedrosa; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Prognostic implications of the magnetic resonance imaging appearance in papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Aarti Sekhar; Elizabeth M Genega; Jonathan Melamed; James S Babb; Amish D Patel; Andy Lo; Robert M Najarian; Muneeb Ahmed; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Daniel Costa; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.