Literature DB >> 22387746

Predictive modeling of chemical hazard by integrating numerical descriptors of chemical structures and short-term toxicity assay data.

Ivan Rusyn1, Alexander Sedykh, Yen Low, Kathryn Z Guyton, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are widely used for in silico prediction of in vivo toxicity of drug candidates or environmental chemicals, adding value to candidate selection in drug development or in a search for less hazardous and more sustainable alternatives for chemicals in commerce. The development of traditional QSAR models is enabled by numerical descriptors representing the inherent chemical properties that can be easily defined for any number of molecules; however, traditional QSAR models often have limited predictive power due to the lack of data and complexity of in vivo endpoints. Although it has been indeed difficult to obtain experimentally derived toxicity data on a large number of chemicals in the past, the results of quantitative in vitro screening of thousands of environmental chemicals in hundreds of experimental systems are now available and continue to accumulate. In addition, publicly accessible toxicogenomics data collected on hundreds of chemicals provide another dimension of molecular information that is potentially useful for predictive toxicity modeling. These new characteristics of molecular bioactivity arising from short-term biological assays, i.e., in vitro screening and/or in vivo toxicogenomics data can now be exploited in combination with chemical structural information to generate hybrid QSAR-like quantitative models to predict human toxicity and carcinogenicity. Using several case studies, we illustrate the benefits of a hybrid modeling approach, namely improvements in the accuracy of models, enhanced interpretation of the most predictive features, and expanded applicability domain for wider chemical space coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22387746      PMCID: PMC3327873          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  65 in total

1.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity?

Authors:  Yvonne C Martin; James L Kofron; Linda M Traphagen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Science and regulation. New science for chemicals policy.

Authors:  Megan R Schwarzman; Michael P Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Gaining Confidence on Molecular Classification through Consensus Modeling and Validation.

Authors:  Weida Tong; Hong Fang; Qian Xie; Huixiao Hong; Leming Shi; Roger Perkins; Uwe Scherf; Federico Goodsaid; Felix Frueh
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.987

5.  Predictivity and reliability of QSAR models: the case of mutagens and carcinogens.

Authors:  Romualdo Benigni; Cecilia Bossa
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.987

6.  Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Alex Y Nie; Michael McMillian; J Brandon Parker; Angelique Leone; Stewart Bryant; Lynn Yieh; Anton Bittner; Jay Nelson; Andrew Carmen; Jackson Wan; Peter G Lord
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 7.  A metabonomic approach for mechanistic exploration of pre-clinical toxicology.

Authors:  Muireann Coen
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Validation of putative genomic biomarkers of nephrotoxicity in rats.

Authors:  Er-Jia Wang; Ronald D Snyder; Mark R Fielden; Roger J Smith; Yi-Zhong Gu
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.

Authors:  Luis G Valerio
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Profiling chemicals based on chronic toxicity results from the U.S. EPA ToxRef Database.

Authors:  Matthew T Martin; Richard S Judson; David M Reif; Robert J Kavlock; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  19 in total

1.  A testing strategy to predict risk for drug-induced liver injury in humans using high-content screen assays and the 'rule-of-two' model.

Authors:  Minjun Chen; Chun-Wei Tung; Qiang Shi; Lei Guo; Leming Shi; Hong Fang; Jürgen Borlak; Weida Tong
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.

Authors:  Sean Watford; Stephen Edwards; Michelle Angrish; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  The Impact of Novel Assessment Methodologies in Toxicology on Green Chemistry and Chemical Alternatives.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Nigel Greene
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Toxicity.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Wenjing Guo; Sugunadevi Sakkiah; Zuowei Ji; Gokhan Yavas; Wen Zou; Minjun Chen; Weida Tong; Tucker A Patterson; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Assessment of beating parameters in human induced pluripotent stem cells enables quantitative in vitro screening for cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Evan F Cromwell; Carole Crittenden; Jessica A Wignall; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Tom Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Andre Kleensang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

8.  Metabolomics in toxicology and preclinical research.

Authors:  Tzutzuy Ramirez; Mardas Daneshian; Hennicke Kamp; Frederic Y Bois; Malcolm R Clench; Muireann Coen; Beth Donley; Steven M Fischer; Drew R Ekman; Eric Fabian; Claude Guillou; Joachim Heuer; Helena T Hogberg; Harald Jungnickel; Hector C Keun; Gerhard Krennrich; Eckart Krupp; Andreas Luch; Fozia Noor; Erik Peter; Bjoern Riefke; Mark Seymour; Nigel Skinner; Lena Smirnova; Elwin Verheij; Silvia Wagner; Thomas Hartung; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Marcel Leist
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

9.  Integrative chemical-biological read-across approach for chemical hazard classification.

Authors:  Yen Low; Alexander Sedykh; Denis Fourches; Alexander Golbraikh; Maurice Whelan; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  ToxPi GUI: an interactive visualization tool for transparent integration of data from diverse sources of evidence.

Authors:  David M Reif; Myroslav Sypa; Eric F Lock; Fred A Wright; Ander Wilson; Tommy Cathey; Richard R Judson; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.