Literature DB >> 21871603

Assessment of corneal thickness and keratocyte density in a rabbit model of laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser confocal microscopy.

Michael D Twa1, Michael J Giese.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the repeatability of corneal thickness and keratocyte density using in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in a rabbit model of laser in situ keratomileusis.
DESIGN: Prospective, experimental animal study.
METHODS: En face tomographic images of corneal tissue were captured from 5 New Zealand white rabbits. Central corneal thickness was compared with conventional ultrasonic pachymetry. Keratocyte density was measured as a function of stromal depth at baseline and 6 weeks after a 130-μm lamellar incision in the following regions: first countable stromal image (30 to 39 μm), anterior stroma (40 to 75 μm), incision zone (76 to 150 μm), mid stroma (151 to 250 μm), and deep stroma (251 to 400 μm).
RESULTS: The mean residual difference between ultrasonic and confocal corneal thickness measurements was 2.1 μm (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.0 to 11.2 μm; P = .61). Before the lamellar incision, keratocyte density was highest in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 53 800 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 35 000 to 72 000 cells/mm(3)) and was least in deep stroma, 27 100 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 22 400 to 32 000 cells/mm(3)). Six weeks after stromal lamellar incision, keratocyte density was unchanged in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 43 700 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 31 800 to 55 500 cells/mm(3); P = .29). There were no changes in cell density in deeper stromal regions.
CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent agreement between ultrasonic and confocal microscopy measurements of corneal thickness. In vivo repeatability of keratocyte density estimation using scanning laser confocal microscopy is comparable with the results of previous reports using tandem-scanning confocal microscopy. Keratocyte density was more varied, but not significantly different, in the anterior-most corneal stroma 6 weeks after a lamellar incision.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21871603      PMCID: PMC3304505          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  29 in total

1.  Comparative in vivo confocal microscopical study of the cornea anatomy of different laboratory animals.

Authors:  Maria Reichard; Marine Hovakimyan; Andreas Wree; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg; Ingo Nolte; Christian Junghans; Rudolf Guthoff; Oliver Stachs
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study.

Authors:  R L Niederer; D Perumal; T Sherwin; C N J McGhee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Measuring corneal thickness with the ConfoScan 4 and z-ring adapter.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; Cherie B Nau; Sanjay V Patel; William M Bourne
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.018

4.  In vivo anterior segment imaging in the rat eye with high speed white light full-field optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kate Grieve; Arnaud Dubois; Manuel Simonutti; Michel Paques; José Sahel; Jean-François Le Gargasson; Claude Boccara
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Basic science and applications of in vivo microscopy.

Authors:  W D Mathers; W M Petroll; J V Jester; H D Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Short-term corneal response to cross-linking in rabbit eyes assessed by in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy and histology.

Authors:  Marine Hovakimyan; Rudolf Guthoff; Steffi Knappe; Andrey Zhivov; Andreas Wree; Alexander Krüger; Alexander Heisterkamp; Oliver Stachs
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  A descriptive and quantitative study of the keratocytes of the corneal stroma of albino rabbits using transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  M J Doughty; W Seabert; J P Bergmanson; Y Blocker
Journal:  Tissue Cell       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.466

9.  Keratocyte density after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy with mitomycin C.

Authors:  Laura de Benito Llopis; Pilar Drake; Pilar Cañadas; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Automated quantification of keratocyte density by using confocal microscopy in vivo.

Authors:  S V Patel; J W McLaren; J J Camp; L R Nelson; W M Bourne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cellular in vivo 3D imaging of the cornea by confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Authors:  Sebastian Bohn; Karsten Sperlich; Stephan Allgeier; Andreas Bartschat; Ruby Prakasam; Klaus-Martin Reichert; Heinrich Stolz; Rudolf Guthoff; Ralf Mikut; Bernd Köhler; Oliver Stachs
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK.

Authors:  Pilar Cañadas; Laura de Benito-Llopis; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Second harmonic generation imaging reveals asymmetry in the rotational helicity of collagen lamellae in chicken corneas.

Authors:  Sheng-Lin Lee; Yang-Fang Chen; Chen-Yuan Dong
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Confocal and Histological Features After Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Corneal Inlay Implantation.

Authors:  Aritz Bidaguren; Javier Mendicute; Iratxe Madarieta; Nerea Garagorri
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.