Michael D Twa1, Michael J Giese. 1. College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas 77204-2020, USA. mdtwa@uh.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the repeatability of corneal thickness and keratocyte density using in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in a rabbit model of laser in situ keratomileusis. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental animal study. METHODS: En face tomographic images of corneal tissue were captured from 5 New Zealand white rabbits. Central corneal thickness was compared with conventional ultrasonic pachymetry. Keratocyte density was measured as a function of stromal depth at baseline and 6 weeks after a 130-μm lamellar incision in the following regions: first countable stromal image (30 to 39 μm), anterior stroma (40 to 75 μm), incision zone (76 to 150 μm), mid stroma (151 to 250 μm), and deep stroma (251 to 400 μm). RESULTS: The mean residual difference between ultrasonic and confocal corneal thickness measurements was 2.1 μm (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.0 to 11.2 μm; P = .61). Before the lamellar incision, keratocyte density was highest in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 53 800 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 35 000 to 72 000 cells/mm(3)) and was least in deep stroma, 27 100 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 22 400 to 32 000 cells/mm(3)). Six weeks after stromal lamellar incision, keratocyte density was unchanged in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 43 700 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 31 800 to 55 500 cells/mm(3); P = .29). There were no changes in cell density in deeper stromal regions. CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent agreement between ultrasonic and confocal microscopy measurements of corneal thickness. In vivo repeatability of keratocyte density estimation using scanning laser confocal microscopy is comparable with the results of previous reports using tandem-scanning confocal microscopy. Keratocyte density was more varied, but not significantly different, in the anterior-most corneal stroma 6 weeks after a lamellar incision.
PURPOSE: To determine the repeatability of corneal thickness and keratocyte density using in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in a rabbit model of laser in situ keratomileusis. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental animal study. METHODS: En face tomographic images of corneal tissue were captured from 5 New Zealand white rabbits. Central corneal thickness was compared with conventional ultrasonic pachymetry. Keratocyte density was measured as a function of stromal depth at baseline and 6 weeks after a 130-μm lamellar incision in the following regions: first countable stromal image (30 to 39 μm), anterior stroma (40 to 75 μm), incision zone (76 to 150 μm), mid stroma (151 to 250 μm), and deep stroma (251 to 400 μm). RESULTS: The mean residual difference between ultrasonic and confocal corneal thickness measurements was 2.1 μm (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.0 to 11.2 μm; P = .61). Before the lamellar incision, keratocyte density was highest in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 53 800 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 35 000 to 72 000 cells/mm(3)) and was least in deep stroma, 27 100 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 22 400 to 32 000 cells/mm(3)). Six weeks after stromal lamellar incision, keratocyte density was unchanged in the first countable frame of the anterior stroma, 43 700 cells/mm(3) (95% CI, 31 800 to 55 500 cells/mm(3); P = .29). There were no changes in cell density in deeper stromal regions. CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent agreement between ultrasonic and confocal microscopy measurements of corneal thickness. In vivo repeatability of keratocyte density estimation using scanning laser confocal microscopy is comparable with the results of previous reports using tandem-scanning confocal microscopy. Keratocyte density was more varied, but not significantly different, in the anterior-most corneal stroma 6 weeks after a lamellar incision.
Authors: Maria Reichard; Marine Hovakimyan; Andreas Wree; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg; Ingo Nolte; Christian Junghans; Rudolf Guthoff; Oliver Stachs Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Kate Grieve; Arnaud Dubois; Manuel Simonutti; Michel Paques; José Sahel; Jean-François Le Gargasson; Claude Boccara Journal: Opt Express Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Marine Hovakimyan; Rudolf Guthoff; Steffi Knappe; Andrey Zhivov; Andreas Wree; Alexander Krüger; Alexander Heisterkamp; Oliver Stachs Journal: Cornea Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Laura de Benito Llopis; Pilar Drake; Pilar Cañadas; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Pilar Cañadas; Laura de Benito-Llopis; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 3.117