PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyze and compare in vivo morphology of healthy cornea of six different laboratory animals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One Pomeranian Coarsewool sheep, 5 Beagle dogs, 1 Norwegian and 2 Domestic Short-haired cats, 20 New Zealand White rabbits, 6 Wistar rats, and 10 Balb/c mice were included. The examination was performed bilaterally, using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph equipped with Rostock Cornea Module. The morphology of living corneal layers was visualized and compared between species. The central corneal thickness, density of keratocytes, and endothelial cells were quantified. RESULTS: The epithelial multilayer showed a similarity in morphology between animal types, displaying three clearly distinguishable layers: superficial, intermediate, and basal. Subbasal nerve fibers were displayed as hyperreflective structures underneath basal cells. The subbasal fibers were confirmed in all species, however, the density varied between species. A pronounced Bowman's membrane was visualized in sheep. In all other species, however, a thin acellular layer with overlying nerve fibers could be seen between basal epithelial cells and anterior stroma. The keratocytes nuclei could be demonstrated in all species except for mice, where no nuclei but only reflective structures resembling keratocytes cell bodies were detected. Overall, the density of keratocytes nuclei was significantly higher in the anterior than in the posterior stroma. Besides endothelial cells density, the endothelial cells morphology was very similar among all species, except for sheep. The endothelial cells were displayed as polygonal structures with bright cytoplasm and dark borders. In sheep, the appearance of the endothelium was very poor because of a thick hyperreflective Descemet's membrane. CONCLUSIONS: The present study will help researchers consider appropriate models for animal experiments, depending on focus of investigation. In vivo CLSM can be used for the characterization of the living cornea over time, thus, reducing the number of animal experiments.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyze and compare in vivo morphology of healthy cornea of six different laboratory animals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One Pomeranian Coarsewool sheep, 5 Beagle dogs, 1 Norwegian and 2 Domestic Short-haired cats, 20 New Zealand White rabbits, 6 Wistar rats, and 10 Balb/c mice were included. The examination was performed bilaterally, using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph equipped with Rostock Cornea Module. The morphology of living corneal layers was visualized and compared between species. The central corneal thickness, density of keratocytes, and endothelial cells were quantified. RESULTS: The epithelial multilayer showed a similarity in morphology between animal types, displaying three clearly distinguishable layers: superficial, intermediate, and basal. Subbasal nerve fibers were displayed as hyperreflective structures underneath basal cells. The subbasal fibers were confirmed in all species, however, the density varied between species. A pronounced Bowman's membrane was visualized in sheep. In all other species, however, a thin acellular layer with overlying nerve fibers could be seen between basal epithelial cells and anterior stroma. The keratocytes nuclei could be demonstrated in all species except for mice, where no nuclei but only reflective structures resembling keratocytes cell bodies were detected. Overall, the density of keratocytes nuclei was significantly higher in the anterior than in the posterior stroma. Besides endothelial cells density, the endothelial cells morphology was very similar among all species, except for sheep. The endothelial cells were displayed as polygonal structures with bright cytoplasm and dark borders. In sheep, the appearance of the endothelium was very poor because of a thick hyperreflective Descemet's membrane. CONCLUSIONS: The present study will help researchers consider appropriate models for animal experiments, depending on focus of investigation. In vivo CLSM can be used for the characterization of the living cornea over time, thus, reducing the number of animal experiments.
Authors: Michelle Samuel; Sara M Thomasy; Allison S Calderon; Philip H Kass; Keith Collins; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Rachel L Redfern; Nimesh Patel; Samuel Hanlon; William Farley; Margaret Gondo; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Alison M McDermott Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Debbie K Chen; Katie E Frizzi; Lucie S Guernsey; Kelsey Ladt; Andrew P Mizisin; Nigel A Calcutt Journal: J Peripher Nerv Syst Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Sara M Thomasy; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Moritz Winkler; Christopher M Reilly; Adeline R Sadeli; Paul Russell; James V Jester; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Mario Matthaei; Huan Meng; Imran Bhutto; Qingguo Xu; Edwin Boelke; Justin Hanes; Albert S Jun Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 2.175