Ruijiang Li1, Benjamin P Fahimian, Lei Xing. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, California 94305-5847, USA. rli2@stanford.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Monoscopic x-ray imaging with on-board kV devices is an attractive approach for real-time image guidance in modern radiation therapy such as VMAT or IMRT, but it falls short in providing reliable information along the direction of imaging x-ray. By effectively taking consideration of projection data at prior times and/or angles through a Bayesian formalism, the authors develop an algorithm for real-time and full 3D tumor localization with a single x-ray imager during treatment delivery. METHODS: First, a prior probability density function is constructed using the 2D tumor locations on the projection images acquired during patient setup. Whenever an x-ray image is acquired during the treatment delivery, the corresponding 2D tumor location on the imager is used to update the likelihood function. The unresolved third dimension is obtained by maximizing the posterior probability distribution. The algorithm can also be used in a retrospective fashion when all the projection images during the treatment delivery are used for 3D localization purposes. The algorithm does not involve complex optimization of any model parameter and therefore can be used in a "plug-and-play" fashion. The authors validated the algorithm using (1) simulated 3D linear and elliptic motion and (2) 3D tumor motion trajectories of a lung and a pancreas patient reproduced by a physical phantom. Continuous kV images were acquired over a full gantry rotation with the Varian TrueBeam on-board imaging system. Three scenarios were considered: fluoroscopic setup, cone beam CT setup, and retrospective analysis. RESULTS: For the simulation study, the RMS 3D localization error is 1.2 and 2.4 mm for the linear and elliptic motions, respectively. For the phantom experiments, the 3D localization error is < 1 mm on average and < 1.5 mm at 95th percentile in the lung and pancreas cases for all three scenarios. The difference in 3D localization error for different scenarios is small and is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm eliminates the need for any population based model parameters in monoscopic image guided radiotherapy and allows accurate and real-time 3D tumor localization on current standard LINACs with a single x-ray imager.
PURPOSE: Monoscopic x-ray imaging with on-board kV devices is an attractive approach for real-time image guidance in modern radiation therapy such as VMAT or IMRT, but it falls short in providing reliable information along the direction of imaging x-ray. By effectively taking consideration of projection data at prior times and/or angles through a Bayesian formalism, the authors develop an algorithm for real-time and full 3D tumor localization with a single x-ray imager during treatment delivery. METHODS: First, a prior probability density function is constructed using the 2D tumor locations on the projection images acquired during patient setup. Whenever an x-ray image is acquired during the treatment delivery, the corresponding 2D tumor location on the imager is used to update the likelihood function. The unresolved third dimension is obtained by maximizing the posterior probability distribution. The algorithm can also be used in a retrospective fashion when all the projection images during the treatment delivery are used for 3D localization purposes. The algorithm does not involve complex optimization of any model parameter and therefore can be used in a "plug-and-play" fashion. The authors validated the algorithm using (1) simulated 3D linear and elliptic motion and (2) 3D tumor motion trajectories of a lung and a pancreas patient reproduced by a physical phantom. Continuous kV images were acquired over a full gantry rotation with the Varian TrueBeam on-board imaging system. Three scenarios were considered: fluoroscopic setup, cone beam CT setup, and retrospective analysis. RESULTS: For the simulation study, the RMS 3D localization error is 1.2 and 2.4 mm for the linear and elliptic motions, respectively. For the phantom experiments, the 3D localization error is < 1 mm on average and < 1.5 mm at 95th percentile in the lung and pancreas cases for all three scenarios. The difference in 3D localization error for different scenarios is small and is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm eliminates the need for any population based model parameters in monoscopic image guided radiotherapy and allows accurate and real-time 3D tumor localization on current standard LINACs with a single x-ray imager.
Authors: Ruijiang Li; Xun Jia; John H Lewis; Xuejun Gu; Michael Folkerts; Chunhua Men; Steve B Jiang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ruijiang Li; John H Lewis; Xun Jia; Xuejun Gu; Michael Folkerts; Chunhua Men; William Y Song; Steve B Jiang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ross I Berbeco; Steve B Jiang; Gregory C Sharp; George T Chen; Hassan Mostafavi; Hiroki Shirato Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2004-01-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ruijiang Li; Edward Mok; Daniel T Chang; Megan Daly; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn; Quynh-Thu Le; Albert Koong; Lei Xing Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Paul J Keall; Doan Trang Nguyen; Ricky O'Brien; Pengpeng Zhang; Laura Happersett; Jenny Bertholet; Per R Poulsen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chun-Chien Shieh; Vincent Caillet; Michelle Dunbar; Paul J Keall; Jeremy T Booth; Nicholas Hardcastle; Carol Haddad; Thomas Eade; Ilana Feain Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Juan Diego Azcona; Ruijiang Li; Edward Mok; Steven Hancock; Lei Xing Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Pengpeng Zhang; Margie Hunt; Arina B Telles; Hai Pham; Michael Lovelock; Ellen Yorke; Guang Li; Laura Happersett; Andreas Rimner; Gig Mageras Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.071