Literature DB >> 21858592

DICOM for implantations--overview and application.

Thomas Treichel1, Michael Gessat, Torsten Prietzel, Oliver Burgert.   

Abstract

Surgeons have to deal with many devices from different vendors within the operating room during surgery. Independent communication standards are necessary for the system integration of these devices. For implantations, three new extensions of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard make use of a common communication standard that may optimise one of the surgeon's presently very time-consuming daily tasks. The paper provides a brief description of these DICOM Supplements and gives recommendations to their application in practice based on workflows that are proposed to be covered by the new standard extension. Two of the workflows are described in detail and separated into phases that are supported by the new data structures. Examples for the application of the standard within these phases give an impression of the potential usage. Even if the presented workflows are from different domains, we identified a generic core that may benefit from the surgical DICOM Supplements. In some steps of the workflows, the surgical DICOM Supplements are able to replace or optimise conventional methods. Standardisation can only be a means for integration and interoperability. Thus, it can be used as the basis for new applications and system architectures. The influence on current applications and communication processes is limited. Additionally, the supplements provide the basis for further applications, such as the support of surgical navigation systems. Given the support of all involved stakeholders, it is possible to provide a benefit for surgeons and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21858592      PMCID: PMC3348981          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9416-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning.

Authors:  M Viceconti; R Lattanzi; B Antonietti; S Paderni; R Olmi; A Sudanese; A Toni
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  International variation in hip replacement rates.

Authors:  H Merx; K Dreinhöfer; P Schräder; T Stürmer; W Puhl; K-P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol.

Authors:  B The; R L Diercks; R E Stewart; P M A van Ooijen; J R van Horn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Bertram The; Nico Verdonschot; Jim R van Horn; Peter M A van Ooijen; Ron L Diercks
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  David R Whiddon; James V Bono
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2008

6.  Determination of digitised radiograph magnification factors for pre-operative templating in hip prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Stephane Descamps; Christine Livesey; Ian Douglas Learmonth
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Eggli; M Pisan; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-05

Review 8.  Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Direct digital radiography in the dental office.

Authors:  A Wenzel; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.512

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  A centralized platform for geo-distributed PACS management.

Authors:  Luís A Bastião Silva; Renato Pinho; Luís S Ribeiro; Carlos Costa; José Luís Oliveira
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  OpenIGTLink interface for state control and visualisation of a robot for image-guided therapy systems.

Authors:  Sebastian Tauscher; Junichi Tokuda; Günter Schreiber; Thomas Neff; Nobuhiko Hata; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Deep learning enabled brain shunt valve identification using mobile phones.

Authors:  Sheeba J Sujit; Eliana Bonfante; Azin Aein; Ivan Coronado; Roy Riascos-Castaneda; Luca Giancardo
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  Service-oriented Device Connectivity interface for a situation recognition system in the OR.

Authors:  Denise Junger; Patrick Beyersdorffer; Christian Kücherer; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  From computer-assisted intervention research to clinical impact: The need for a holistic approach.

Authors:  Sébastien Ourselin; Mark Emberton; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.545

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.