Literature DB >> 17826278

Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties.

Bertram The1, Nico Verdonschot, Jim R van Horn, Peter M A van Ooijen, Ron L Diercks.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the clinical and technical results of digital preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasties with analogue planning. Two hundred and ten total hip arthroplasties were randomized. All plans were constructed on standardized radiographs by the surgeon who performed the arthroplasty the next day. The main outcome was accuracy of the preoperative plan. Secondary outcomes were operation time and a radiographic assessment of the arthroplasty. Digital preoperative plans were more accurate in planning the cup (P < .05) and scored higher on the postoperative radiologic assessment of cemented cup (P = .03) and stem (P < .01) components. None of the other comparisons reached statistical significance. We conclude that digital plans slightly outperform analogue plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826278     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

1.  [Implant position of total hip arthroplasty shafts. Establishment of a new method for comparison between planned and achieved shaft positions].

Authors:  A Fottner; A Steinbrück; E Volkmer; F Haasters; F Mazoochian; V Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Reliability of preoperative measurement with standardized templating in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Ferran Abat; Juan Sarasquete; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

3.  DICOM for implantations--overview and application.

Authors:  Thomas Treichel; Michael Gessat; Torsten Prietzel; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty-on intra- and interobserver reliability and professional experience.

Authors:  Nils J Strøm; Are Hugo Pripp; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

5.  The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Arnd Steinbrück; Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek; Matthias Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  How to best measure femoral length and lateralisation after total hip arthroplasty on antero-posterior pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonin; Laurent Jacquot; Laurent Boulard; Patrick Reynaud; Mo Saffarini; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Christianne J Lane; Ryan C Koonce; Andrew P Hartman; Kenneth Ball; James C Esch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-09-07

8.  Templating in uncemented THA. On accuracy and postoperative leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Nils J Strøm; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-17

9.  Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Mitsuaki Noda; Hiroshi Nashiki; Takehiko Matsushita; Atsuyuki Inui; Shinya Hayashi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-06

10.  Is analog preoperative planning still applicable?-comparison of accuracy of analog and computer preoperative planning methods in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julian Dutka; Slawomir Kiepura; Mateusz Bukowczan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.