Literature DB >> 21854981

The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly.

Valentin Magidson1, Christopher B O'Connell, Jadranka Lončarek, Raja Paul, Alex Mogilner, Alexey Khodjakov.   

Abstract

Error-free chromosome segregation requires stable attachment of sister kinetochores to the opposite spindle poles (amphitelic attachment). Exactly how amphitelic attachments are achieved during spindle assembly remains elusive. We employed photoactivatable GFP and high-resolution live-cell confocal microscopy to visualize complete 3D movements of individual kinetochores throughout mitosis in nontransformed human cells. Combined with electron microscopy, molecular perturbations, and immunofluorescence analyses, this approach reveals unexpected details of chromosome behavior. Our data demonstrate that unstable lateral interactions between kinetochores and microtubules dominate during early prometaphase. These transient interactions lead to the reproducible arrangement of chromosomes in an equatorial ring on the surface of the nascent spindle. A computational model predicts that this toroidal distribution of chromosomes exposes kinetochores to a high density of microtubules which facilitates subsequent formation of amphitelic attachments. Thus, spindle formation involves a previously overlooked stage of chromosome prepositioning which promotes formation of amphitelic attachments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854981      PMCID: PMC3291198          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  41 in total

1.  Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis.

Authors:  W Mosgöller; A R Leitch; J K Brown; J S Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Kid, a novel kinesin-like DNA binding protein, is localized to chromosomes and the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  N Tokai; A Fujimoto-Nishiyama; Y Toyoshima; S Yonemura; S Tsukita; J Inoue; T Yamamota
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 regulates spindle association of human Eg5, a kinesin-related motor essential for bipolar spindle formation in vivo.

Authors:  A Blangy; H A Lane; P d'Hérin; M Harper; M Kress; E A Nigg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Precise spatial positioning of chromosomes during prometaphase: evidence for chromosomal order.

Authors:  R Nagele; T Freeman; L McMorrow; H Y Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The prometaphase configuration and chromosome order in early mitosis.

Authors:  N Chaly; D L Brown
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  hNuf2 inhibition blocks stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and induces mitotic cell death in HeLa cells.

Authors:  Jennifer G DeLuca; Ben Moree; Jennifer M Hickey; John V Kilmartin; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism.

Authors:  R V Skibbens; V P Skeen; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells.

Authors:  C L Rieder; S P Alexander
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E A Davison; L C Jensen; L Cassimeris; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  154 in total

1.  Chromosome congression is promoted by CENP-Q- and CENP-E-dependent pathways.

Authors:  James Bancroft; Philip Auckland; Catarina P Samora; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  CLASPs prevent irreversible multipolarity by ensuring spindle-pole resistance to traction forces during chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Elsa Logarinho; Stefano Maffini; Marin Barisic; Andrea Marques; Alberto Toso; Patrick Meraldi; Helder Maiato
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 4.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Mitotic Protein CSPP1 Interacts with CENP-H Protein to Coordinate Accurate Chromosome Oscillation in Mitosis.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhu; Zhikai Wang; Wenwen Wang; Chunli Wang; Shasha Hua; Zeqi Su; Larry Brako; Minerva Garcia-Barrio; Mingliang Ye; Xuan Wei; Hanfa Zou; Xia Ding; Lifang Liu; Xing Liu; Xuebiao Yao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Eg5 restricts anaphase B spindle elongation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth Collins; Barbara J Mann; Patricia Wadsworth
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-12-12

Review 7.  Differentiating the roles of microtubule-associated proteins at meiotic kinetochores during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Yasutaka Kakui; Masamitsu Sato
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

9.  Contributions of Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Rotational Diffusion to Kinetochore Capture.

Authors:  Robert Blackwell; Oliver Sweezy-Schindler; Christopher Edelmaier; Zachary R Gergely; Patrick J Flynn; Salvador Montes; Ammon Crapo; Alireza Doostan; J Richard McIntosh; Matthew A Glaser; Meredith D Betterton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.