Literature DB >> 2295685

Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells.

C L Rieder1, S P Alexander.   

Abstract

During mitosis in cultured newt pneumocytes, one or more chromosomes may become positioned well removed (greater than 50 microns) from the polar regions during early prometaphase. As a result, these chromosomes are delayed for up to 5 h in forming an attachment to the spindle. The spatial separation of these chromosomes from the polar microtubule-nucleating centers provides a unique opportunity to study the initial stages of kinetochore fiber formation in living cells. Time-lapse Nomarski-differential interference contrast videomicroscopic observations reveal that late-attaching chromosomes always move, upon attachment, into a single polar region (usually the one closest to the chromosome). During this attachment, the kinetochore region of the chromosome undergoes a variable number of transient poleward tugs that are followed, shortly thereafter, by rapid movement of the chromosome towards the pole. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence and serial section EM reveal that the kinetochores and kinetochore regions of nonattached chromosomes lack associated microtubules. By contrast, these methods reveal that the attachment and subsequent poleward movement of a chromosome correlates with the association of a single long microtubule with one of the kinetochores of the chromosome. This microtubule traverses the entire distance between the spindle pole and the kinetochore and often extends well past the kinetochore. From these results, we conclude that the initial attachment of a chromosome to the newt pneumocyte spindle results from an interaction between a single polar-nucleated microtubule and one of the kinetochores on the chromosome. Once this association is established, the kinetochore is rapidly transported poleward along the surface of the microtubule by a mechanism that is not dependent on microtubule depolymerization. Our results further demonstrate that the motors for prometaphase chromosome movement must be either on the surface of the kinetochore (i.e., within the corona but not the plate), distributed along the surface of the kinetochore microtubules, or both.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2295685      PMCID: PMC2115982          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  53 in total

Review 1.  Microtubule dynamics and kinetochore function in mitosis.

Authors:  T J Mitchison
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1988

2.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of cells from serial sections and whole-cell mounts using multilevel contouring of stereo micrographs.

Authors:  M Marko; A Leith; D Parsons
Journal:  J Electron Microsc Tech       Date:  1988-08

3.  Microtubule dynamics in the chromosomal spindle fiber: analysis by fluorescence and high-resolution polarization microscopy.

Authors:  L Cassimeris; S Inoué; E D Salmon
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1988

Review 4.  The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1988

5.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. II. Kinetochore structure and function.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Do anaphase chromosomes chew their way to the pole or are they pulled by actin?

Authors:  A Forer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells.

Authors:  L Cassimeris; N K Pryer; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Microtubule dynamics investigated by microinjection of Paramecium axonemal tubulin: lack of nucleation but proximal assembly of microtubules at the kinetochore during prometaphase.

Authors:  G Geuens; A M Hill; N Levilliers; A Adoutte; M DeBrabander
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro.

Authors:  R A Walker; S Inoué; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching.

Authors:  E D Salmon; R J Leslie; W M Saxton; M L Karow; J R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  187 in total

1.  CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; G K Chan; B Zubrowski; M S Savoian; M T Sauer; T J Yen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement.

Authors:  J D Pickett-Heaps; A Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Chromosome motors on the move. From motion to spindle checkpoint activity.

Authors:  S Brunet; I Vernos
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  LIS1, CLIP-170's key to the dynein/dynactin pathway.

Authors:  Frédéric M Coquelle; Michal Caspi; Fabrice P Cordelières; Jim P Dompierre; Denis L Dujardin; Cynthia Koifman; Patrick Martin; Casper C Hoogenraad; Anna Akhmanova; Niels Galjart; Jan R De Mey; Orly Reiner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Analysis of the distribution of the kinetochore protein Ndc10p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 3-D modeling of mitotic spindles.

Authors:  Thomas Müller-Reichert; Ingrid Sassoon; Eileen O'Toole; Maryse Romao; Anthony J Ashford; Anthony A Hyman; Claude Antony
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.

Authors:  Reto Gassmann; Andrew J Holland; Dileep Varma; Xiaohu Wan; Filiz Civril; Don W Cleveland; Karen Oegema; Edward D Salmon; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Mitosis - The story : Conly Rieder of the Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, interviewed at the University of Exeter, UK, by James Wakefield and Herbert Macgregor, October 2010.

Authors:  Conly Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Towards a quantitative understanding of mitotic spindle assembly and mechanics.

Authors:  Alex Mogilner; Erin Craig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.