Literature DB >> 3733881

Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle.

C L Rieder, E A Davison, L C Jensen, L Cassimeris, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

During mitosis a monooriented chromosome oscillates toward and away from its associated spindle pole and may be positioned many micrometers from the pole at the time of anaphase. We tested the hypothesis of Pickett-Heaps et al. (Pickett-Heaps, J. D., D. H. Tippit, and K. R. Porter, 1982, Cell, 29:729-744) that this behavior is generated by the sister kinetochores of a chromosome interacting with, and moving in opposite direction along, the same set of polar microtubules. When the sister chromatids of a monooriented chromosome split at the onset of anaphase in newt lung cells, the proximal chromatid remains stationary or moves closer to the pole, with the kinetochore leading. During this time the distal chromatid moves a variable distance radially away from the pole, with one or both chromatid arms leading. Subsequent electron microscopy of these cells revealed that the kinetochore on the distal chromatid is free of microtubules. These results suggest that the distal kinetochore is not involved in the positioning of a monooriented chromosome relative to the spindle pole or in its oscillatory movements. To test this conclusion we used laser microsurgery to create monooriented chromosomes containing one kinetochore. Correlative light and electron microscopy revealed that chromosomes containing one kinetochore continue to undergo normal oscillations. Additional observations on normal and laser-irradiated monooriented chromosomes indicated that the chromosome does not change shape, and that the kinetochore region is not deformed, during movement away from the pole. Thus movement away from the pole during an oscillation does not appear to arise from a push generated by the single pole-facing kinetochore fiber, as postulated (Bajer, A. S., 1982, J. Cell Biol., 93:33-48). When the chromatid arms of a monooriented chromosome are cut free of the kinetochore, they are immediately ejected radially outward from the spindle pole at a constant velocity of 2 micron/min. This ejection velocity is similar to that of the outward movement of an oscillating chromosome. We conclude that the oscillations of a monooriented chromosome and its position relative to the spindle pole result from an imbalance between poleward pulling forces acting at the proximal kinetochore and an ejection force acting along the chromosome, which is generated within the aster and half-spindle.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3733881      PMCID: PMC2113830          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  22 in total

1.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  A cinematographic study of meiosis in salamander spermatocytes in vitro.

Authors:  T Seto; J Kezer; C M Pomerat
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1969

3.  Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  D Mazia; N Paweletz; G Sluder; E M Finze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Microfilament or microtubule assembly or disassembly against a force.

Authors:  T L Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spermatogenesis in Sciara coprophila. I. Chromosome orientation on the monopolar spindle of meiosis I.

Authors:  A G Abbott; J E Hess; S A Gerbi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Taxol-induced anaphase reversal: evidence that elongating microtubules can exert a pushing force in living cells.

Authors:  A S Bajer; C Cypher; J Molè-Bajer; H M Howard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Meiosis in Sciara coprophila: structure of the spindle and chromosome behavior during the first meiotic division.

Authors:  D F Kubai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells.

Authors:  P A McNeill; M W Berns
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis.

Authors:  A S Bajer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length.

Authors:  T S Hays; D Wise; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  119 in total

Review 1.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; G K Chan; B Zubrowski; M S Savoian; M T Sauer; T J Yen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Xkid is degraded in a D-box, KEN-box, and A-box-independent pathway.

Authors:  Anna Castro; Suzanne Vigneron; Cyril Bernis; Jean-Claude Labbé; Thierry Lorca
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Kerry S Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The nuclear-mitotic apparatus protein is important in the establishment and maintenance of the bipolar mitotic spindle apparatus.

Authors:  C H Yang; M Snyder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Microtubule composition: cryptography of dynamic polymers.

Authors:  Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 9.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  A functional relationship between NuMA and kid is involved in both spindle organization and chromosome alignment in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Aime A Levesque; Louisa Howard; Michael B Gordon; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.