Literature DB >> 21853217

[Influence of different multifocal intraocular lens concepts on retinal stray light parameters].

A Ehmer1, T M Rabsilber, A Mannsfeld, M J Sanchez, M P Holzer, G U Auffarth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) are known to induce various photic phenomena depending on the optical principle. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between stray light measurements performed with the C-Quant (Oculus, Germany) and the results of a subjective patient questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study three different MIOLs were compared: AMO ReZoom (refractive design, n=10), AMO ZM900 (diffractive design, n=10) and Oculentis Mplus (near segment design, n=10). Cataract and refractive patients were enrolled in the study. Functional results were evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively followed by stray light measurements and a subjective questionnaire.
RESULTS: Surgery was performed for all patients without complications. The three groups were matched for age, IOL power and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Significantly different stray light (median) values log(s) were found (Kruskal-Wallis test, p<0.05): 1.12 log (refractive), 1.13 log (segment) and 1.28 log (diffractive). The subjective questionnaire did not show differences in glare perception but refractive MIOL patients noticed more halos surrounding light sources than the diffractive and segment MIOL patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Stray light and subjective photopic phenomena do not show any basic correlation. Measurements in patients with refractive MIOLs showed less stray light than near segment or diffractive MIOLs. However, refractive MIOLs induced more halos compared to the other groups analyzed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21853217     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2411-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  25 in total

1.  Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight.

Authors:  Luuk Franssen; Joris E Coppens; Thomas J T P van den Berg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; David P Piñero; Ana B Plaza-Puche; Maria Joanna Rodriguez Chan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Relevance of pupil size in the clinical determination of retinal straylight on young healthy human eyes.

Authors:  Santiago García-Lázaro; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Susana Ortí-Navarro; Alejandro Cerviño; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Analysis of intraocular straylight, especially in relation to age.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Rudy Nuijts; Pierre Levy; Eduard Haefliger; José F Alfonso
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Retinal straylight and complaint scores 18 months after implantation of the AcrySof monofocal and ReSTOR diffractive intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Thomas Hofmann; Bruno Zuberbuhler; Alejandro Cervino; Robert Montés-Micó; Eduard Haefliger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Association of lens opacities, intraocular straylight, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in European drivers.

Authors:  Ralph Michael; Laurentius J van Rijn; Thomas J T P van den Berg; Rafael I Barraquer; Günther Grabner; Helmut Wilhelm; Tanja Coeckelbergh; Martin Emesz; Patrik Marvan; Christian Nischler
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Salvatore Cillino; Alessandra Casuccio; Francesco Di Pace; Raffaella Morreale; Francesco Pillitteri; Giovanni Cillino; Gaetano Lodato
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  [Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber; T Kohnen; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction.

Authors:  Thomas J T P Van Den Berg; L J René Van Rijn; Ralph Michael; Christian Heine; Tanja Coeckelbergh; Christian Nischler; Helmuth Wilhelm; Günther Grabner; Martin Emesz; Rafael I Barraquer; Joris E Coppens; Luuk Franssen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  6 in total

1.  High order aberration and straylight evaluation after cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Florian T A Kretz; Tamer Tandogan; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Binocular function to increase visual outcome in patients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Florian T A Kretz; Matthias Müller; Matthias Gerl; Ralf H Gerl; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Assessment of dysphotopsia in pseudophakic subjects with multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Phillip J Buckhurst; Shehzad A Naroo; Leon N Davies; Sunil Shah; Tom Drew; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 4.  Premium intraocular lenses: The past, present and future.

Authors:  Jasmin Zvorničanin; Edita Zvorničanin
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  Intraocular lens multifocality combined with the compensation for corneal spherical aberration: a new concept of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens.

Authors:  Reiner Friedrich
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-24

6.  Comparison of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jan Willem van der Linden; Ivanka J van der Meulen; Maarten P Mourits; Ruth Lapid-Gortzak
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.