Literature DB >> 20024686

Relevance of pupil size in the clinical determination of retinal straylight on young healthy human eyes.

Santiago García-Lázaro1, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Susana Ortí-Navarro, Alejandro Cerviño, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of pupil size in the psychometric determination of intraocular straylight determined by the compensation comparison method in a population of young healthy adults.
METHODS: Straylight was measured in 21 eyes from 11 young healthy subjects using the C-Quant (Oculus, Germany). Subjects were dilated with Phenylephrine 5%, and varying pupil size was simulated using three different diaphragms of 3, 5 and 6 mm in diameter. Three measurements were taken with each of the apertures in a randomized sequence. Mixed effects and repeated measures ANOVA was applied to test the significance of differences in straylight values for the fixed pupil diameters. Correlation analysis was applied to test relationships between the measurements for each fixed pupil diameter, and Bland-Altmann plots displayed the distribution of differences.
RESULTS: Significant differences between the straylight values obtained for the different fixed pupil diameters were not found. Correlation analysis did not show relationships between the values obtained for different diameters either (p > 0.05 in all cases). Bland-Altmann plots show that average differences are around zero regardless of the actual value measured, but there is also a substantial individual variation, with differences going as far up as 0.5 Log(s) units in some cases.
CONCLUSION: In healthy human eyes, straylight values measured with the Van den Berg straylightmeter are not affected significantly by the subject's pupil size, although individual variations exist implying that no control for pupil size is required when estimating average amounts of retinal straylight from samples of eyes, but is desirable for the assessment of longitudinal variations of straylight in individual subjects, especially when assessing effects of surgical procedures and/or lens designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024686     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1258-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

Review 1.  On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation.

Authors:  Johannes J Vos
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Reliability of the compensation comparison stray-light measurement method.

Authors:  Joris E Coppens; Luuk Franssen; L J van Rijn; Thomas J T P van den Berg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight.

Authors:  Luuk Franssen; Joris E Coppens; Thomas J T P van den Berg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effect of sport-tinted contact lenses for contrast enhancement on retinal straylight measurements.

Authors:  Alejandro Cerviño; Jose M Gonzalez-Meijome; João M M Linhares; Sarah L Hosking; Robert Montes-Mico
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Straylight values 1 month after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Jeroen J G Beerthuizen; Luuk Franssen; Monika Landesz; Thomas J T P van den Berg
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  On the relation between glare and straylight.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Analysis of intraocular straylight, especially in relation to age.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Stray light in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Authors:  H G Veraart; T J van den Berg; R Hennekes; A M Adank
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Retinal straylight and complaint scores 18 months after implantation of the AcrySof monofocal and ReSTOR diffractive intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Thomas Hofmann; Bruno Zuberbuhler; Alejandro Cervino; Robert Montés-Micó; Eduard Haefliger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Stray light in radial keratotomy and the influence of pupil size and straylight angle.

Authors:  H G Veraart; T J van den Berg; J K IJspeert; O L Cardozo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Influence of different multifocal intraocular lens concepts on retinal stray light parameters].

Authors:  A Ehmer; T M Rabsilber; A Mannsfeld; M J Sanchez; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Iris color and visual functions.

Authors:  Christian Nischler; Ralph Michael; Christine Wintersteller; Patrick Marvan; Laurentius J van Rijn; Joris E Coppens; Thomas J T P van den Berg; Martin Emesz; Günther Grabner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  South American Values of the Optical Straylight Function.

Authors:  Emilia Longhi Bitencourt; Dora Fix Ventura; Marcelo Fernandes Costa
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24

4.  Comparison of the Retinal Straylight in Pseudophakic Eyes with PMMA, Hydrophobic Acrylic, and Hydrophilic Acrylic Spherical Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Guo; Jun Li; Hui Song; Xin Tang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.