Literature DB >> 21847541

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis.

María Nieves Plana1, Carmen Carreira, Alfonso Muriel, Miguel Chiva, Víctor Abraira, Jose Ignacio Emparanza, Xavier Bonfill, Javier Zamora.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting additional lesions and contralateral cancer not identified using conventional imaging in primary breast cancer.
METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to estimate diagnostic accuracy indices and the impact of MRI on surgical management.
RESULTS: Fifty articles were included (n = 10,811 women). MRI detected additional disease in 20% of women and in the contralateral breast in 5.5%. The summary PPV of ipsilateral additional disease was 67% (95% CI 59-74%). For contralateral breast, the PPV was 37% (95% CI 27-47%). For ipsilateral lesions, MRI devices ≥1.5 Tesla (T) had higher PPV (75%, 95% CI 64-83%) than MRI with <1.5 T (59%, 95% CI 53-71%). Similar results were found for contralateral cancer, PPV 40% (95% CI 29-53%) and 19% (95% CI 8-39%) for high- and low-field equipments, respectively. True positive MRI findings prompted conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to more extensive surgery in 12.8% of women while in 6.3% this conversion was inappropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy, but MRI findings should be pathologically verified because of the high FP rate. Future research on this emerging technology should focus on patient outcome as the primary end-point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847541     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2238-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  69 in total

1.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Gian M Giuseppetti; Pietro Panizza; Massimo Bazzocchi; Alfonso Fausto; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Albert P E Besnard; Sara H Muller; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Authors:  L Esserman; N Hylton; L Yassa; J Barclay; S Frankel; E Sickles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications.

Authors:  Cameron D Adkisson; Laura A Vallow; Kristin Kowalchik; Rebecca McNeil; Stephanie Hines; Elizabeth Deperi; Alvaro Moreno; Vivek Roy; Edith A Perez; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging--guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment.

Authors:  J E Tan; S G Orel; M D Schnall; D J Schultz; L J Solin
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Authors:  K Schelfout; M Van Goethem; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; A M Schelfhout; P Leyman; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; J Van Den Haute; J P Gillardin; W Tjalma; J C Van Der Auwera; P Buytaert; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  39 in total

1.  Factors associated with MRI detection of occult lesions in newly diagnosed breast cancers.

Authors:  Julie Wecsler; Young Ju Jeong; Akshara S Raghavendra; Wendy J Mack; Debasish Tripathy; Mary W Yamashita; Pulin A Sheth; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Christy A Russell; Heather MacDonald; Stephen F Sener; Julie E Lang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.

Authors:  Vivian Youngjean Park; Sungheon G Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Long-term survival outcomes in invasive lobular carcinoma patients with and without preoperative MR imaging: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The utility of MRI for pre-operative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Huang; D H Xie; L Guo; C H Hu; X Fang; Q Meng; X X Ping; Z W Lu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial: effect of breast MR imaging assessments and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Mitchell D Schnall; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the normal breast: influences of fibroglandular tissue composition and background parenchymal enhancement.

Authors:  Michael Jonathan Plaza; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Is MRI Helpful?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Allison Hirsch; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  The Value of Patient and Tumor Factors in Predicting Preoperative Breast MRI Outcomes.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Daniel S Hippe; Ahmed Alaa; Safia H Cheeney; Mihaela van der Schaar; Savannah C Partridge; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 9.  Impact of preoperative breast MRI on surgical decision making and clinical outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Armen Parsyan; Awadh Alqahtani; Benoit Mesurolle; Sarkis Meterissian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Floor M Knuttel; Bertine L Stehouwer; Ruud M Pijnappel; Maurice Aaj van den Bosch
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.