Literature DB >> 15913987

Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis.

Eline E Deurloo1, Johannes L Peterse, Emiel J Th Rutgers, Albert P E Besnard, Sara H Muller, Kenneth G A Gilhuijs.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the incidence and impact of additional findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the workup of patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and to optimise the specificity of further workup by combining radiological reading with computerised analysis. One hundred and sixteen patients eligible for BCT underwent preoperative MRI where the gold standard was histology or follow-up (median 35 months, range 23-48). The incidence of additional findings and impact on treatment (wider excision/conversion to mastectomy) were assessed. The specificity of referral to further workup was also assessed without and with computerised analysis. Additional findings from MRI occurred in 41% of patients, requiring workup in 78%. In 22% the findings were malignant, causing change in treatment. Specificity was 33% (10/30) for radiological reading alone, and 97% (29/30) combined with computer analysis. Our findings show that additional findings preoperative MRI required workup in approximately one-third of patients and we suggest that combining radiological reading with computer analysis has the potential to accurately exclude benign lesions from further workup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913987     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  16 in total

1.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Beyza Ozcinar; Munire Kayahan; Abdullah Igci; Mehtap Tunaci; Vahit Ozmen; Gulden Acunas; Ekrem Yavuz; Mustafa Kecer; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; William F A Klein Zeggelink; H Jelle Teertstra; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Sara H Muller; Harry Bartelink; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Technical aspects of breast MRI--do they affect outcomes?

Authors:  Ruth Warren; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Richard Black; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Perfusion-based fluorescence imaging method delineates diverse organs and identifies multifocal tumors using generic near-infrared molecular probes.

Authors:  Jessica Miller; Steven T Wang; Inema Orukari; Julie Prior; Gail Sudlow; Xinming Su; Kexian Liang; Rui Tang; Elizabeth M C Hillman; Katherine N Weilbaecher; Joseph P Culver; Mikhail Y Berezin; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis.

Authors:  María Nieves Plana; Carmen Carreira; Alfonso Muriel; Miguel Chiva; Víctor Abraira; Jose Ignacio Emparanza; Xavier Bonfill; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Evaluation of tissue sampling methods used for MRI-detected contralateral breast lesions in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial.

Authors:  Wendy B DeMartini; Lucy Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rajini Katipamula; Amy C Degnim; Tanya Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Charles Loprinzi; Clive S Grant; Kathleen R Brandt; Sandhya Pruthi; Christopher G Chute; Janet E Olson; Fergus J Couch; James N Ingle; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Robin M Ciocca; Brian L Egleston; Linda Sesa; Kathryn Evers; Elin R Sigurdson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy?

Authors:  Kelli Pettit; Mary Ellen Swatske; Feng Gao; Lorena Salavaggione; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Barbara S Monsees; Timothy J Eberlein; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.