Literature DB >> 21846981

Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.

Henryk Skarzynski1, Artur Lorens, Monika Matusiak, Marek Porowski, Piotr H Skarzynski, Chris J James.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Nucleus Straight Research Array (SRA) cochlear implant has a new 25-mm electrode carrier designed to minimize insertion trauma, in particular allowing easy insertion via the round window. The aims of this study were to measure preoperative to postoperative benefit in terms of speech recognition in quiet and in noise in three groups of patients (electrical complement, EC; electrical stimulation, ES; electro-acoustic stimulation, EAS) with varying levels of low-frequency hearing, and to evaluate the preservation of residual hearing after implantation with the SRA cochlear implant.
METHODS: The study design was prospective with sequential enrolment and within-subject comparisons: 23 adult cochlear implant candidates were divided into three groups according to their level of preoperative residual hearing at 500 Hz (EC ≤50 dB; 50 dB < EAS < 80 dB; ES ≥80 dB). Monosyllabic word recognition using the SRA cochlear implant in combination with residual low-frequency hearing was assessed at 4 and 13 months after implantation. Hearing threshold levels were also monitored over time.
RESULTS: Subjects across all three groups had significant improvements in speech recognition scores (i.e. >20 percentage points) both for listening in quiet (71% of subjects) and in noise (100% of subjects). The average score at 4 months after operation for words presented in quiet was 61.7%, and in 10 dB SNR noise 46.5%, compared to 34.4 and 10.6% preoperatively (p < 0.001). All subjects retained measurable hearing at 500 Hz in the implanted ear at 4 months after the operation; mean increases were 19, 29 and 1 dB for the EC, EAS and ES groups (n = 21). Across frequencies of 125-1000 Hz, the median increase in thresholds was 15 dB up to 13 months postoperatively (n = 15).
CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition performance of subjects with various levels of residual low-frequency hearing was significantly improved with the SRA cochlear implant. A high level and rate of hearing preservation was achieved with the SRA implanted using a round window surgical technique. Subjects with preoperative low-frequency hearing levels between 50 and 80 dB HL (EAS group) tended to lose more hearing than those with either better or worse hearing.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21846981     DOI: 10.1159/000329366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  16 in total

1.  Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.

Authors:  Annett Franke-Trieger; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Saleh Mohebbi; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

4.  The feasibility of endoscopic transcanal approach for insertion of various cochlear electrodes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lela Migirov; Yisgav Shapira; Michael Wolf
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Insertion characteristics and placement of the Mid-Scala electrode array in human temporal bones using detailed cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Dzemal Gazibegovic; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Veli-Matti Vartiainen; Heikki Löppönen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Nick Pawsey; Marcel Kluge; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  S Irving; A K Wise; R E Millard; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.