Literature DB >> 21845434

Genetic variation of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia, chemical and physical defenses that affect mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, attack and tree mortality.

Daniel S Ott1, Alvin D Yanchuk, Dezene P W Huber, Kimberly F Wallin.   

Abstract

Plant secondary chemistry is determined by both genetic and environmental factors, and while large intraspecific variation in secondary chemistry has been reported frequently, the levels of genetic variation of many secondary metabolites in forest trees in the context of potential resistance against pests have been rarely investigated. We examined the effect of tree genotype and environment/site on the variation in defensive secondary chemistry of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia, against the fungus, Grosmannia clavigera (formerly known as Ophiostoma clavigerum), associated with the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Terpenoids were analyzed in phloem samples from 887, 20-yr-old trees originating from 45 half-sibling families planted at two sites. Samples were collected both pre- and post-inoculation with G. clavigera. Significant variation in constitutive and induced terpenoid compounds was attributed to differences among families. The response to the challenge inoculation with G. clavigera was strong for some individual compounds, but primarily for monoterpenoids. Environment (site) also had a significant effect on the accumulation of some compounds, whereas for others, no significant environmental effect occurred. However, for a few compounds significant family x environment interactions were found. These results suggest that P. c. latifolia secondary chemistry is under strong genetic control, but the effects depend on the individual compounds and whether or not they are expressed constitutively or following induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21845434     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0003-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  14 in total

Review 1.  Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses.

Authors:  Nancy Stamp
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers.

Authors:  T D Paine; K F Raffa; T C Harrington
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Genomic hardwiring and phenotypic plasticity of terpenoid-based defenses in conifers.

Authors:  Dezene P W Huber; Steven Ralph; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Genetic variation within and between populations of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) for susceptibility to Melampsora pinitorqua Rostr. (pine twist rust).

Authors:  C Quencez; C Bastien
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Effects of mass inoculation on induced oleoresin response in intensively managed loblolly pine.

Authors:  Kier D Klepzig; Daniel J Robison; Glenn Fowler; Peter R Minchin; Fred P Hain; H Lee Allen
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Biosynthesis of mono- and sesquiterpenes in carrot roots and leaves (Daucus carota L.): metabolic cross talk of cytosolic mevalonate and plastidial methylerythritol phosphate pathways.

Authors:  Daniela Hampel; Armin Mosandl; Matthias Wüst
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Genetic variation in primary metabolites of Pastinaca sativa; can herbivores act as selective agents?

Authors:  Arthur R Zangerl; May R Berenbaum
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Eugene B Smalley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Pathogenicity of four blue-stain fungi associated with aggressive and nonaggressive bark beetles.

Authors:  P Krokene; H Solheim
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  20 in total

1.  Temperature-driven range expansion of an irruptive insect heightened by weakly coevolved plant defenses.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Erinn N Powell; Philip A Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest?

Authors:  Inka Lusebrink; Nadir Erbilgin; Maya L Evenden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Population divergence in the ontogenetic trajectories of foliar terpenes of a Eucalyptus species.

Authors:  Christina L Borzak; Brad M Potts; Noel W Davies; Julianne M O'Reilly-Wapstra
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Celia K Boone; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Engelmann Spruce Chemotypes in Colorado and their Effects on Symbiotic Fungi Associated with the North American Spruce Beetle.

Authors:  Thomas Seth Davis; Fiona B Horne; Jens C Yetter; Jane E Stewart
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Primary and Secondary Metabolite Profiles of Lodgepole Pine Trees Change with Elevation, but Not with Latitude.

Authors:  Melanie Mullin; J G Klutsch; J A Cale; A Hussain; S Zhao; C Whitehouse; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Ectomycorrhizal fungal species differentially affect the induced defensive chemistry of lodgepole pine.

Authors:  Sanat S Kanekar; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Rapid Induction of Multiple Terpenoid Groups by Ponderosa Pine in Response to Bark Beetle-Associated Fungi.

Authors:  Ken Keefover-Ring; Amy Trowbridge; Charles J Mason; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Evaluation of potential genetic and chemical markers for Scots pine tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum infection.

Authors:  Mukrimin Mukrimin; Andriy Kovalchuk; Rajendra P Ghimire; Minna Kivimäenpää; Hui Sun; Jarmo K Holopainen; Fred O Asiegbu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Isolation and functional characterization of a methyl jasmonate-responsive 3-carene synthase from Lavandula x intermedia.

Authors:  Ayelign M Adal; Lukman S Sarker; Ashley D Lemke; Soheil S Mahmoud
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.