Mukrimin Mukrimin1,2, Andriy Kovalchuk1, Rajendra P Ghimire3, Minna Kivimäenpää3, Hui Sun1,4, Jarmo K Holopainen3, Fred O Asiegbu5. 1. Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. 2. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Hasanuddin University, Jln. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, 90245, Makassar, Indonesia. 3. Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland. 4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China. 5. Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. fred.asiegbu@helsinki.fi.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: Two terpene compounds and four genes were identified as potential biomarkers for further evaluation for Scots pine susceptibility or tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is one of the main sources of timber in the boreal zone of Eurasia. Commercial pine plantations are vulnerable to root and butt rot disease caused by the fungus Heterobasidion annosum. The pathogen affects host growth rate, causes higher mortality and decreases in timber quality, resulting in considerable economic losses to forest owners. Genetic and biochemical factors contributing to Scots pine tolerance against H. annosum infection are not well understood. We assessed the predictive values of a set of potential genetic and chemical markers in a field experiment. We determined the expression levels of 25 genes and the concentrations of 36 terpenoid compounds in needles of 16 Scots pine trees randomly selected from a natural population prior to artificial infection. Stems of the same trees were artificially inoculated with H. annosum, and the length of necrotic lesions was documented 5 months post inoculation. Higher expression level of four genes included in our analysis and encoding predicted α-pinene synthase (two genes), geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS), and metacaspase 5 (MC5), could be associated with trees exhibiting increased levels of necrotic lesion formation in response to fungal inoculation. In contrast, concentrations of two terpenoid compounds, β-caryophyllene and α-humulene, showed significant negative correlations with the lesion size. Further studies with larger sample size will help to elucidate new biomarkers or clarify the potential of the evaluated markers for use in Scots pine disease resistance breeding programs.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Two terpene compounds and four genes were identified as potential biomarkers for further evaluation for Scots pine susceptibility or tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is one of the main sources of timber in the boreal zone of Eurasia. Commercial pine plantations are vulnerable to root and butt rot disease caused by the fungus Heterobasidion annosum. The pathogen affects host growth rate, causes higher mortality and decreases in timber quality, resulting in considerable economic losses to forest owners. Genetic and biochemical factors contributing to Scots pine tolerance against H. annosum infection are not well understood. We assessed the predictive values of a set of potential genetic and chemical markers in a field experiment. We determined the expression levels of 25 genes and the concentrations of 36 terpenoid compounds in needles of 16 Scots pine trees randomly selected from a natural population prior to artificial infection. Stems of the same trees were artificially inoculated with H. annosum, and the length of necrotic lesions was documented 5 months post inoculation. Higher expression level of four genes included in our analysis and encoding predicted α-pinene synthase (two genes), geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS), and metacaspase 5 (MC5), could be associated with trees exhibiting increased levels of necrotic lesion formation in response to fungal inoculation. In contrast, concentrations of two terpenoid compounds, β-caryophyllene and α-humulene, showed significant negative correlations with the lesion size. Further studies with larger sample size will help to elucidate new biomarkers or clarify the potential of the evaluated markers for use in Scots pine disease resistance breeding programs.
Authors: Björn Nystedt; Nathaniel R Street; Anna Wetterbom; Andrea Zuccolo; Yao-Cheng Lin; Douglas G Scofield; Francesco Vezzi; Nicolas Delhomme; Stefania Giacomello; Andrey Alexeyenko; Riccardo Vicedomini; Kristoffer Sahlin; Ellen Sherwood; Malin Elfstrand; Lydia Gramzow; Kristina Holmberg; Jimmie Hällman; Olivier Keech; Lisa Klasson; Maxim Koriabine; Melis Kucukoglu; Max Käller; Johannes Luthman; Fredrik Lysholm; Totte Niittylä; Ake Olson; Nemanja Rilakovic; Carol Ritland; Josep A Rosselló; Juliana Sena; Thomas Svensson; Carlos Talavera-López; Günter Theißen; Hannele Tuominen; Kevin Vanneste; Zhi-Qiang Wu; Bo Zhang; Philipp Zerbe; Lars Arvestad; Rishikesh Bhalerao; Joerg Bohlmann; Jean Bousquet; Rosario Garcia Gil; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Pieter de Jong; John MacKay; Michele Morgante; Kermit Ritland; Björn Sundberg; Stacey Lee Thompson; Yves Van de Peer; Björn Andersson; Ove Nilsson; Pär K Ingvarsson; Joakim Lundeberg; Stefan Jansson Journal: Nature Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mukrimin Mukrimin; Andriy Kovalchuk; Leandro G Neves; Emad H A Jaber; Matti Haapanen; Matias Kirst; Fred O Asiegbu Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Dawn E Hall; Macaire M S Yuen; Sharon Jancsik; Alfonso Lara Quesada; Harpreet K Dullat; Maria Li; Hannah Henderson; Adriana Arango-Velez; Nancy Y Liao; Roderick T Docking; Simon K Chan; Janice Ek Cooke; Colette Breuil; Steven Jm Jones; Christopher I Keeling; Jörg Bohlmann Journal: BMC Plant Biol Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 4.215
Authors: Diana Köpke; Roland Schröder; Hanna M Fischer; Jonathan Gershenzon; Monika Hilker; Axel Schmidt Journal: Planta Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 4.116
Authors: Jun-Jun Liu; Arezoo Zamany; Charlie Cartwright; Yu Xiang; Simon F Shamoun; Benjamin Rancourt Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.627
Authors: Mengxia Liu; Kai Wang; Matti Haapanen; Rajendra P Ghimire; Minna Kivimäenpää; Fred O Asiegbu Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 6.627