Nkiruka C Atuegwu1, Xia Li2, Lori R Arlinghaus2, Richard G Abramson3, Jason M Williams1, A Bapsi Chakravarthy4, Vandana G Abramson5, Thomas E Yankeelov6. 1. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310 and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675. 2. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310. 3. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675; and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-5671 and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6307 and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838. 6. Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2310; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240-1807; Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1631; and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6838.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The authors propose a method whereby serially acquired DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and FDG-PET breast data sets can be spatially and temporally coregistered to enable the comparison of changes in parameter maps at the voxel level. METHODS: First, the authors aligned the PET and MR images at each time point rigidly and nonrigidly. To register the MR images longitudinally, the authors extended a nonrigid registration algorithm by including a tumor volume-preserving constraint in the cost function. After the PET images were aligned to the MR images at each time point, the authors then used the transformation obtained from the longitudinal registration of the MRI volumes to register the PET images longitudinally. The authors tested this approach on ten breast cancer patients by calculating a modified Dice similarity of tumor size between the PET and MR images as well as the bending energy and changes in the tumor volume after the application of the registration algorithm. RESULTS: The median of the modified Dice in the registered PET and DCE-MRI data was 0.92. For the longitudinal registration, the median tumor volume change was -0.03% for the constrained algorithm, compared to -32.16% for the unconstrained registration algorithms (p = 8 × 10(-6)). The medians of the bending energy were 0.0092 and 0.0001 for the unconstrained and constrained algorithms, respectively (p = 2.84 × 10(-7)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the proposed method can accurately spatially align DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and FDG-PET breast images acquired at different time points during therapy while preventing the tumor from being substantially distorted or compressed.
PURPOSE: The authors propose a method whereby serially acquired DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and FDG-PET breast data sets can be spatially and temporally coregistered to enable the comparison of changes in parameter maps at the voxel level. METHODS: First, the authors aligned the PET and MR images at each time point rigidly and nonrigidly. To register the MR images longitudinally, the authors extended a nonrigid registration algorithm by including a tumor volume-preserving constraint in the cost function. After the PET images were aligned to the MR images at each time point, the authors then used the transformation obtained from the longitudinal registration of the MRI volumes to register the PET images longitudinally. The authors tested this approach on ten breast cancerpatients by calculating a modified Dice similarity of tumor size between the PET and MR images as well as the bending energy and changes in the tumor volume after the application of the registration algorithm. RESULTS: The median of the modified Dice in the registered PET and DCE-MRI data was 0.92. For the longitudinal registration, the median tumor volume change was -0.03% for the constrained algorithm, compared to -32.16% for the unconstrained registration algorithms (p = 8 × 10(-6)). The medians of the bending energy were 0.0092 and 0.0001 for the unconstrained and constrained algorithms, respectively (p = 2.84 × 10(-7)). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the proposed method can accurately spatially align DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and FDG-PET breast images acquired at different time points during therapy while preventing the tumor from being substantially distorted or compressed.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Thomas E Yankeelov; Nkiruka Atuegwu; David Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Xia Li; E Brian Welch; Lori R Arlinghaus; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime Farley; Mary E Loveless; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie A Means-Powell; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Lori R Arlinghaus; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime S Farley; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid A Mayer; Julie A Means-Powell; Ingrid M Meszoely; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Gregory D Ayers; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Nkiruka Atuegwu; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Sandeep R Bhave; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robert K Doot; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Paul E Kinahan; Brenda F Kurland; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Amy M Fowler; Manoj Kumar; Leah Henze Bancroft; Kelley Salem; Jacob M Johnson; Jillian Karow; Scott B Perlman; Tyler J Bradshaw; Samuel A Hurley; Alan B McMillan; Roberta M Strigel Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Jason M Williams; Sudheer D Rani; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Tzu-Cheng Lee; Lawrence R MacDonald; Savannah C Partridge; Hakmook Kang; Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard G Abramson; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jason M Williams; Lori R Arlinghaus; Sudheer D Rani; Martha D Shone; Vandana G Abramson; Praveen Pendyala; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; William J Gorge; Joshua G Knowland; Ronald K Lattanze; Steven R Perrin; Charles W Scarantino; David W Townsend; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Limin Zhang; Shudong Jiang; Yan Zhao; Jinchao Feng; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Angela M Jarrett; David A Hormuth; Stephanie L Barnes; Xinzeng Feng; Wei Huang; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.609