Literature DB >> 17893052

Breast MR imaging at 3T.

Christiane K Kuhl1.   

Abstract

For breast MR imaging, a high spatial resolution is important to resolve morphologic and architectural details of even small tumors. At the same time, fast imaging is required to account for the transient enhancement of breast cancers. This is the "temporal versus spatial dilemma" that current breast MR imaging protocols face. This article provides a short introduction to the clinical use of breast MR imaging, presents the different concepts that exist for breast MR imaging in general, and explains the advantages and disadvantages of the respective approaches. The specific high-field-induced physical changes and their effects on breast imaging are explained. A short overview is given on the current level of evidence regarding breast MR imaging at higher magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17893052     DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  12 in total

1.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Fat saturation in dynamic breast MRI at 3 Tesla: is the Dixon technique superior to spectral fat saturation? A visual grading characteristics study.

Authors:  P Clauser; K Pinker; T H Helbich; P Kapetas; M Bernathova; P A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C Riegger; J Herrmann; J Nagarajah; J Hecktor; S Kuemmel; F Otterbach; S Hahn; A Bockisch; T Lauenstein; G Antoch; T A Heusner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS® descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer?

Authors:  K Pinker-Domenig; W Bogner; S Gruber; H Bickel; S Duffy; M Schernthaner; P Dubsky; U Pluschnig; M Rudas; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Reni S Butler; Christine Chen; Reena Vashi; Regina J Hooley; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28

8.  Longitudinal and multi-echo transverse relaxation times of normal breast tissue at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Richard A E Edden; Seth A Smith; Peter B Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Current and future trends in magnetic resonance imaging assessments of the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.