Literature DB >> 29460927

Semiautomatic determination of arterial input function in DCE-MRI of the abdomen.

Harrison Kim1, Desiree E Morgan1.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a semiautomatic segmentation technique of the abdominal aorta to determine the arterial input function (AIF). A total of 24 patients having therapy naïve abdominal cancers were imaged using DCE-MRI on a 3T MR scanner. DCE-MRI continued for 4.2 minutes with 2.1 seconds temporal resolution (120 acquisitions). Gadoteridol (0.1 mmol/kg) was infused intravenously at 30 seconds after starting DCE-MRI, and flushed with 20-ml saline (2 ml/s). Patients were instructed to hold breath after maximal inhalation, and repeat as needed to full inspiration. The location of the abdominal aorta was manually identified, but its segmentation and motion tracking were automatically implemented. AIFs determined in the aortic region with and without tracking motion were statistically compared. The aortic region was further segmented into multiple smaller regions, and the AIF change according to the size of the region of interest (ROI) was examined. The displacement of the abdominal aorta during DCE-MRI was 3.4±2.3 (mean±SD) mm. The root mean square error (RMSE) of AIF from the best fitting curve was 0.110±0.010 mM after motion correction, which was significantly smaller than that before motion correction (0.134±0.016 mM; p<0.001). The amplitude of AIF varied up to 15% according to the ROI size. However, when the radius of ROI was reduced more than 3 mm, the variation in AIF amplitude was less than 5%. Therefore the ROI having smaller radius than that of aorta will need to be used to determine a reliable AIF in abdominal DCE-MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aorta; Arterial input function; Automatic segmentation; DCE-MRI

Year:  2017        PMID: 29460927      PMCID: PMC5815381          DOI: 10.14738/jbemi.42.3041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Eng Med Imaging        ISSN: 2055-1266


  25 in total

1.  The effect of blood inflow and B(1)-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Caleb Roberts; Ross Little; Yvonne Watson; Sha Zhao; David L Buckley; Geoff J M Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Denis Peruzzo; Alessandra Bertoldo; Francesca Zanderigo; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.

Authors:  Roberto Sanz-Requena; José Manuel Prats-Montalbán; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Ángel Alberich-Bayarri; Gracián García-Martí; Rosario Pérez; Alberto Ferrer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Intratumor partitioning and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Guanghua Gong; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Lymphoma and inflammation in the orbit: Diagnostic performance with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Liyuan Song; Xinyan Wang; Jing Li; Junfang Xian; Feifei Wang; Pan Tan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects.

Authors:  J Logan; J S Fowler; N D Volkow; A P Wolf; S L Dewey; D J Schlyer; R R MacGregor; R Hitzemann; B Bendriem; S J Gatley
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xia Li; E Brian Welch; Lori R Arlinghaus; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime Farley; Mary E Loveless; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie A Means-Powell; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  DCE MRI of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rose M Berman; Anna M Brown; Silvia D Chang; Sandeep Sankineni; Meet Kadakia; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Modification of population based arterial input function to incorporate individual variation.

Authors:  Harrison Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Variability in Quantitative DCE-MRI: Sources and Solutions.

Authors:  Harrison Kim
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2018

3.  Disposable point-of-care portable perfusion phantom for quantitative DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Martin D Holland; Andres Morales; Sean Simmons; Brandon Smith; Samuel R Misko; Xiaoyu Jiang; David A Hormuth; Chase Christenson; Roy P Koomullil; Desiree E Morgan; Yufeng Li; Junzhong Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov; Harrison Kim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.