Literature DB >> 7738196

Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures.

V Gilsanz1, M L Loro, T F Roe, J Sayre, R Gilsanz, E E Schulz.   

Abstract

Reductions in bone density are a major determinant of vertebral fractures in the elderly population. However, women have a greater incidence of fractures than men, although their spinal bone densities are comparable. Recent observations indicate that women have 20-25% smaller vertebrae than men after accounting for differences in body size. To assess whether elderly women with vertebral fractures have smaller vertebrae than women who do not experience fractures, we reviewed 1,061 computed tomography bone density studies and gathered 32-matched pairs of elderly women, with reduced bone density, whose main difference was absence or presence of vertebral fractures. Detailed measurements of the dimensions of unfractured vertebrae and the moment arm of spinal musculature from T12 to L4 were calculated from computed tomography images in the 32 pairs of women matched for race, age, height, weight, and bone density. The cross-sectional area of unfractured vertebrae was 4.9-11.5% (10.5 +/- 1.4 vs 9.7 +/- 1.5 cm2; P < 0.0001) smaller and the moment arm of spinal musculature was 3.2-7.4% (56.4 +/- 5.1 vs 53.1 +/- 4.4 mm; P < 0.0001) shorter in women with fractures, implying that mechanical stress within intact vertebral bodies for equivalent loads is 5-17% greater in women with fractures compared to women without fractures. Such significant variations are very likely to contribute to vertebral fractures in osteoporotic women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738196      PMCID: PMC295847          DOI: 10.1172/JCI117925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  26 in total

1.  Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; J L Kelsey; M C Nevitt; K J O'Dowd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Relationship between trabecular vertebral body density and fractures: a quantitative definition of spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  C V Odvina; J E Wergedal; C R Libanati; E E Schulz; D J Baylink
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 8.694

4.  Osteoporosis. Part I. Advanced radiologic assessment using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1983-07

5.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A B Schultz; G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Variation in trabecular structure of vertebrae with age.

Authors:  P J Atkinson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1967

9.  Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone.

Authors:  O Lindahl
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-02

10.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  42 in total

1.  The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific.

Authors:  S Bass; P D Delmas; G Pearce; E Hendrich; A Tabensky; E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing skeletal architecture in mice: emergence of Cdh11 as a primary candidate gene regulating femoral morphology.

Authors:  Charles R Farber; Scott A Kelly; Ethan Baruch; Daniel Yu; Kunjie Hua; Derrick L Nehrenberg; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Ryan J Buus; Theodore Garland; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  High heritability of bone size at the hip and spine in Chinese.

Authors:  Wei-Xia Jian; Ji-Rong Long; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 4.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  BMD: the problem.

Authors:  Robert P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Interindividual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during postnatal growth and predictable based on bone robustness.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Siddharth Bhola; Andrew Goldstone; Fred Chen; Jessica Chrzanowski; Carl J Terranova; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.