Literature DB >> 21835287

Rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion after intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation and survival in cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction.

Krishnan Ramanathan1, Michael E Farkouh, John E Cosmi, John K French, Shannon M Harkness, Vladimír Džavík, Lynn A Sleeper, Judith S Hochman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating an acute myocardial infarction, a strategy of early revascularization (ERV) versus initial medical stabilization (IMS) improves survival. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) provides hemodynamic support and facilitates coronary angiography and revascularization in CS patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated 499 patients with record of systemic hypoperfusion status as an early response to IABC from the SHOCK trial (n = 185) and registry (n = 314) to determine the association between rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion (CRH) after 30 minutes of IABC and in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality. Rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion was highly associated with lower in-hospital mortality (29% versus 65%, P < .001) in all patients. In the SHOCK trial, among patients assigned to ERV versus IMS, 30-day mortality was 26% versus 29%, respectively, with CRH and 61% versus 81%, respectively, without CRH after commencing IABC. The corresponding 1-year mortality rates were 35% versus 52% for ERV and 69% versus 87% for IMS (interaction P ≥ .25 at both time points). After adjusting for important correlates of outcome (left ventricular ejection fraction, age, and randomization to ERV), a significant association remained between CRH and registry and trial in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.39, P < .001) and trial 1-year mortality (odds ratio .28, 95% CI 0.12-0.67, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In CS patients, CRH after commencing IABC was independently associated with improved in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year survival regardless of early revascularization. In CS patients, CRH with IABC is an important early prognostic feature.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835287      PMCID: PMC3155687          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  16 in total

Review 1.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. A review of physiological principles, clinical results, and device safety.

Authors:  K T Weber; J S Janicki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Alteration of mechanical performance of the ventricle by intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.

Authors:  C W Urschel; L Eber; J Forrester; J Matloff; R Carpenter; E Sonnenblick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry.

Authors:  J J Ferguson; M Cohen; R J Freedman; G W Stone; M F Miller; D L Joseph; E M Ohman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  J S Hochman; C E Buller; L A Sleeper; J Boland; V Dzavik; T A Sanborn; E Godfrey; H D White; J Lim; T LeJemtel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock: observations from the GUSTO-I Study. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  R D Anderson; E M Ohman; D R Holmes; I Col; A L Stebbins; E R Bates; R J Stomel; C B Granger; E J Topol; R M Califf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Lack of progress in cardiogenic shock: lessons from the GUSTO trials.

Authors:  V Menon; J S Hochman; A Stebbins; M Pfisterer; J Col; R D Anderson; D Hasdai; D R Holmes; E R Bates; E J Topol; R M Califf; E M Ohman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation improves survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Waksman; A T Weiss; M S Gotsman; Y Hasin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock: insights from the GUSTO-I trial.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Jennifer White; David Hasdai; Patricia K Hodgson; Peter B Berger; Eric J Topol; Robert M Califf; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Effect of protracted dobutamine infusion on survival of patients in cardiogenic shock treated with intraaortic balloon pumping.

Authors:  S D Moulopoulos; S F Stamateolopoulos; J N Nanas; D A Kontoyannis; S N Nanas
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score.

Authors:  R M Califf; H R Phillips; M C Hindman; D B Mark; K L Lee; V S Behar; R A Johnson; D B Pryor; R A Rosati; G S Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alex Reyentovich; Maya H Barghash; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

Review 3.  The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI.

Authors:  Nina Manian; Janki Thakker; Ajith Nair
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 4.  [Infarct-related cardiogenic shock : Prognosis and treatment].

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; H Lemm; A Geppert; M Buerke; M Russ; K Werdan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  Impact of Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation on Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Gao; Ying-Zi Huang; Hong-Mei Zhao; Qing-Song Sun; Man Luo; Li-Qun Pang; Hong Sun
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.