Literature DB >> 27356877

Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Alex Reyentovich1, Maya H Barghash1, Judith S Hochman2.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition that occurs in response to reduced cardiac output in the presence of adequate intravascular volume and results in tissue hypoxia. Cardiogenic shock has several underlying aetiologies, with the most common being acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Refractory cardiogenic shock presents as persistent tissue hypoperfusion despite administration of adequate doses of two vasoactive medications and treatment of the underlying aetiology. Investigators of the SHOCK trial reported a long-term mortality benefit of emergency revascularization for shock complicating AMI. Since the publication of the SHOCK trial and subsequent guideline recommendations, the increase in community-based use of percutaneous coronary intervention for this condition has resulted in a significant decline in mortality. Despite these successes in the past 15 years, mortality still remains exceptionally high, particularly in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. In this Review, we discuss the aetiology and pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock and summarize the data on the available therapeutics and their limitations. Although new mechanical circulatory support devices have been shown to improve haemodynamic variables in patients with shock complicating AMI, they did not improve clinical outcomes and are associated with high costs and complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27356877     DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol        ISSN: 1759-5002            Impact factor:   32.419


  84 in total

1.  Early treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock with percutaneous veno-arterial ECMO implanted in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Pablo Díez-Villanueva; Iago Sousa; Alberto Núñez; Felipe Díez; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2014-10-30

2.  Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Johan Lassus; Alessandro Sionis; Lars Køber; Tuukka Tarvasmäki; Jindrich Spinar; John Parissis; Marek Banaszewski; Jose Silva-Cardoso; Valentina Carubelli; Salvatore Di Somma; Heli Tolppanen; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele; Markku S Nieminen; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  S M Hollenberg; C J Kavinsky; J E Parrillo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial.

Authors:  S Scheidt; G Wilner; H Mueller; D Summers; M Lesch; G Wolff; J Krakauer; M Rubenfire; P Fleming; G Noon; N Oldham; T Killip; A Kantrowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Romeo; Maria Cristina Acconcia; Domenico Sergi; Alessia Romeo; Saverio Muscoli; Serafina Valente; Gian Franco Gensini; Flavia Chiarotti; Quintilio Caretta
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Distal limb perfusion: Achilles' heel in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Prashant N Mohite; Javid Fatullayev; Olaf Maunz; Sundip Kaul; Anton Sabashnikov; Alexander Weymann; Diana G Saez; Nikhil P Patil; Bartlomiej Zych; Aron F Popov; Fabio DeRobertis; Toufan Bahrami; Mohamed Amrani; Andre R Simon
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  V Menon; J G Webb; L D Hillis; L A Sleeper; R Abboud; V Dzavik; J N Slater; R Forman; E S Monrad; J D Talley; J S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Zehender; W Kasper; E Kauder; M Schönthaler; A Geibel; M Olschewski; H Just
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.

Authors:  Siddharth A Wayangankar; Sripal Bangalore; Lisa A McCoy; Hani Jneid; Faisal Latif; Wassef Karrowni; Konstantinos Charitakis; Dmitriy N Feldman; Habib A Dakik; Laura Mauri; Eric D Peterson; John Messenger; Mathew Roe; Debabrata Mukherjee; Andrew Klein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The ICM research agenda on extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Dan Brodie; Yih-Sharng Chen; Eddy Fan; José P S Henriques; Carol Hodgson; Philipp M Lepper; Pascal Leprince; Kunihiko Maekawa; Thomas Muller; Sebastian Nuding; Dagmar M Ouweneel; Antoine Roch; Matthieu Schmidt; Hiroo Takayama; Alain Vuylsteke; Karl Werdan; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Extracorporeal Life Support Organization COVID-19 Interim Guidelines.

Authors:  Kiran Shekar; Jenelle Badulak; Giles Peek; Udo Boeken; Heidi J Dalton; Lovkesh Arora; Bishoy Zakhary; Kollengode Ramanathan; Joanne Starr; Bindu Akkanti; M Velia Antonini; Mark T Ogino; Lakshmi Raman
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Mechanical circulatory support device-heart hysteretic interaction can predict left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Steven P Keller; Sonya S Bhavsar; Noam Josephy; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Combination of echocardiography and emergency endomyocardial biopsy for suspected myocarditis in the cardiovascular emergency medical care.

Authors:  Hirohide Matsuura; Nozomi Watanabe; Yoshisato Shibata; Yujiro Asada
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 5.  Evolving therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with new or worsening heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  John W Ostrominski; Muthiah Vaduganathan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 6.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-29

7.  A Scalable Approach to Determine Intracardiac Pressure From Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Signals.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Christian Moyer; Ahmad El Katerji; Steven P Keller; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Simulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circulatory Support Systems.

Authors:  Farhad R Nezami; Mehdi Ramezanpour; Farhan Khodaee; Efrat Goffer; Elazer R Edelman; Steven P Keller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  CD14 Involvement in Third-degree Skin Burn-induced Myocardial Injury via the MAPK Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Zhensen Zhu; Ben Zou; Songying Gao; Dongmei Zhang; Jingdong Guo; Bo Chen; Haixin Hou; Xiongxiang Zhu
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 10.  Does multivessel revascularization fit all patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Jin Hu; Xiao-Song Li; Chen Jin; Yue-Jin Yang
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.