Literature DB >> 17964038

Long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock: insights from the GUSTO-I trial.

Mandeep Singh1, Jennifer White, David Hasdai, Patricia K Hodgson, Peter B Berger, Eric J Topol, Robert M Califf, David R Holmes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess long-term outcome and determine its predictors among 30-day survivors of cardiogenic shock.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock have high in-hospital and 30-day mortality, but there are little data about those who survive beyond 30 days.
METHODS: We analyzed baseline, in-hospital, and survival data from patients in the U.S. with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock enrolled in the GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries)-I trial and compared them with patients in the same trial who did not have shock.
RESULTS: Of 22,883 patients enrolled in the U.S., shock occurred in 1,891 (8.3%); 953 (50.4%) survived 30 days and 527 (27.8%) survived 11 years. Of 20,992 U.S. patients without shock, 20,360 (96.9%) survived 30 days and 14,131 (67.3%) survived 11 years. After the first year, 2% to 4% of patients died each year regardless of whether they had cardiogenic shock. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we were able to predict long-term mortality in all U.S. GUSTO-I 30-day survivors from their baseline demographics and in-hospital complications. The strongest predictors were diabetes mellitus, cardiogenic shock, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, current smoking, anterior infarct, higher Killip class, higher heart rate, and older age; patients >75 years were at highest risk. Percutaneous revascularization during the index hospitalization was associated with a reduced risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cardiogenic shock who survive 30 days after STEMI, annual mortality rates of 2% to 4% approximate those of patients without shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964038     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  23 in total

1.  Rapid complete reversal of systemic hypoperfusion after intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation and survival in cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Krishnan Ramanathan; Michael E Farkouh; John E Cosmi; John K French; Shannon M Harkness; Vladimír Džavík; Lynn A Sleeper; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndromes-miles to go?

Authors:  Salman Salahuddin; Balram Bhargava
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

3.  Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya; Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; Salpy V Pamboukian; José A Tallaj; William L Holman; Ryan S Cantor; David C Naftel; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The significance of heart rate turbulence in predicting major cardiovascular events in patients after myocardial infarction treated invasively.

Authors:  Sylwia Cebula; Beata Sredniawa; Jacek Kowalczyk; Agata Musialik-Lydka; Aleksandra Wozniak; Agnieszka Sedkowska; Andrzej Swiatkowski; Zbigniew Kalarus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; K Hirsch; L Wachsmuth; M Buerke; S Unverzagt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 1: prediction, presentation and medical therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Rajesh Kharbanda; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-29

8.  Efficacy of cardiac resynchronization in acutely infarcted canine hearts with electromechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Grant V Chow; Michael G Silverman; Richard S Tunin; Albert C Lardo; Saman Nazarian; David A Kass
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a single centre experience.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; Anand Gnanaraj; Balashankar Gomathi; Ezhilan Janakiraman; Ulhas Pandurangi; Latchumanadhas Kalidoss; S Mullasari Ajit
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

10.  Primary Angioplasty For Patients in Cardiogenic Shock: Optimal Management.

Authors:  Jubin Joseph; Tiffany Patterson; Satpal Arri; Hannah McConkey; Simon R Redwood
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.