Nina Manian1, Janki Thakker2, Ajith Nair3. 1. Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, 77807, USA. 2. Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St, Ste 6C, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 3. Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St, Ste 6C, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. ajith.nair@bcm.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a significant expansion of the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for patient with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with cardiogenic shock (CS) and in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the indications and outcomes of these devices in high-risk cardiac patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Early revascularization of the culprit-lesion is the immediate goal in ACS patients with CS and the use of pulmonary artery catheters has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. The MCS devices that are used for myocardial support include the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), the left ventricle (LV) to aorta pumps, left atrium (LA) to arterial pumps, and right atrial (RA) to arterial pumps. This review provides an overview on the use of these devices in patients with ACS and CS and those undergoing high-risk PCI. Attention is focused on the IABP, the Impella (LV-aorta pump), the TandemHeart (LA-arterial pump), and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (RA-arterial pump). The indications, evidence, and complications of each device are reviewed. Each device varies in its physiological effect on native heart function, complexity in insertion, and complications. The use of MCS devices for high-risk PCI and CS has increased in recent years and have demonstrated efficacy in supporting a vulnerable myocardium. Although recommendations can be made for use of each device in certain clinical scenarios, further evidence through registries and clinical trials is necessary to guide appropriate device utilization.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a significant expansion of the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for patient with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with cardiogenic shock (CS) and in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the indications and outcomes of these devices in high-risk cardiac patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Early revascularization of the culprit-lesion is the immediate goal in ACS patients with CS and the use of pulmonary artery catheters has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. The MCS devices that are used for myocardial support include the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), the left ventricle (LV) to aorta pumps, left atrium (LA) to arterial pumps, and right atrial (RA) to arterial pumps. This review provides an overview on the use of these devices in patients with ACS and CS and those undergoing high-risk PCI. Attention is focused on the IABP, the Impella (LV-aorta pump), the TandemHeart (LA-arterial pump), and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (RA-arterial pump). The indications, evidence, and complications of each device are reviewed. Each device varies in its physiological effect on native heart function, complexity in insertion, and complications. The use of MCS devices for high-risk PCI and CS has increased in recent years and have demonstrated efficacy in supporting a vulnerable myocardium. Although recommendations can be made for use of each device in certain clinical scenarios, further evidence through registries and clinical trials is necessary to guide appropriate device utilization.
Authors: Holger Thiele; Ibrahim Akin; Marcus Sandri; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Peter Nordbeck; Tobias Geisler; Ulf Landmesser; Carsten Skurk; Andreas Fach; Harald Lapp; Jan J Piek; Marko Noc; Tomaž Goslar; Stephan B Felix; Lars S Maier; Janina Stepinska; Keith Oldroyd; Pranas Serpytis; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Barthelemy; Kurt Huber; Stephan Windecker; Stefano Savonitto; Patrizia Torremante; Christiaan Vrints; Steffen Schneider; Steffen Desch; Uwe Zeymer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Georgios Sianos; Marie-Angèle Morel; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Keith Dawkins; Marcel van den Brand; Nic Van Dyck; Mary E Russell; Friedrich W Mohr; Patrick W Serruys Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Abhinav Saxena; A Reshad Garan; Navin K Kapur; William W O'Neill; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Sean P Pinney; Nir Uriel; Daniel Burkhoff; Morton Kern Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul Guedeney; Olivier Barthélémy; Michel Zeitouni; Marie Hauguel-Moreau; Georges Hage; Mathieu Kerneis; Benoit Lattuca; Pavel Overtchouk; Stéphanie Rouanet; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Marcus Sandri; Ibrahim Akin; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele; Gilles Montalescot Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Behnam N Tehrani; Alexander G Truesdell; Mitchell A Psotka; Carolyn Rosner; Ramesh Singh; Shashank S Sinha; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Holger Thiele; Ibrahim Akin; Marcus Sandri; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Georg Fuernau; Ingo Eitel; Peter Nordbeck; Tobias Geisler; Ulf Landmesser; Carsten Skurk; Andreas Fach; Alexander Jobs; Harald Lapp; Jan J Piek; Marko Noc; Tomaž Goslar; Stephan B Felix; Lars S Maier; Janina Stepinska; Keith Oldroyd; Pranas Serpytis; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Barthelemy; Kurt Huber; Stephan Windecker; Lukas Hunziker; Stefano Savonitto; Patrizia Torremante; Christiaan Vrints; Steffen Schneider; Uwe Zeymer; Steffen Desch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John G Webb; April M Lowe; Timothy A Sanborn; Harvey D White; Lynn A Sleeper; Ronald G Carere; Christopher E Buller; S Chiu Wong; Jean Boland; Vlad Dzavik; Mark Porway; Gordon Pate; Geoffrey Bergman; Judith S Hochman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lynne Warner Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; James B Young; Mariell Jessup; Leslie Miller; Robert L Kormos; David C Naftel; Karen Ulisney; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; James K Kirklin Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 10.247