Literature DB >> 21832889

Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Ann E Geers1, Allison L Sedey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify factors predictive of successful English language outcomes in adolescents who received a cochlear implant (CI) between 2 and 5 yrs of age.
DESIGN: All 112 participants had been part of a previous study examining English language outcomes at the age of 8 and 9 yrs with CIs. The participants were given a battery of language and verbal reasoning tests in their preferred communication mode along with measures of working memory (digit span) and verbal rehearsal speed (sentence repetition duration). The degree to which students' language performance was enhanced when sign was added to spoken language was estimated at both test sessions. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to document factors contributing to overall language outcomes.
RESULTS: A substantial proportion of the adolescents obtained test scores within or above 1SD compared with hearing age-mates in the tests' normative samples: 71% on a verbal intelligence test, 68% on a measure of language content, 71% on receptive vocabulary, and 74% on expressive vocabulary. Improvement in verbal intelligence scores over an 8-yr interval exceeded expectation based on age-mates in the test's normative sample. Better English language outcomes were associated with shorter duration of deafness before cochlear implantation, higher nonverbal intelligence, higher family socioeconomic status, longer digit spans, and faster verbal rehearsal speed as measured by sentence repetition rate. Students whose current receptive vocabulary scores were not enhanced by the addition of signs also exhibited higher English language scores than those without sign enhancement; however, sign enhancement demonstrated in the elementary school years was not predictive of later high-school language skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study support the provision of CIs to children at the youngest age possible. In addition, it highlights the substantial role that cognition plays in later language outcomes. Although the students' use of sign to enhance language skills during the elementary years does not appear to have a negative impact on later language skills, students who continue to rely on sign to improve their vocabulary comprehension into high school typically exhibit poorer English language outcomes than students whose spoken language comprehension parallels or exceeds their comprehension of speech + sign. Overall, the language results obtained from these teenagers with more than 10 yrs of CI experience reflect substantial improvement over the verbal skills exhibited by adolescents with similar levels of hearing loss before the advent of CIs. These optimistic results were observed in teenagers who were among the first in the United States and Canada to receive a CI. We anticipate that the use of improved technology that is being initiated at even younger ages should lead to age-appropriate language levels in an even larger proportion of children with CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21832889      PMCID: PMC3157037          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fa41dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  20 in total

1.  Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Statistical analysis and interpretation in a study of prelingually deaf children implanted before five years of age.

Authors:  Michael J Strube
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students.

Authors:  C B Traxler
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2000

4.  Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: sample characteristics and data collection methods.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Christine A Brenner; Emily A Tobey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Factors Influencing Elementary and High-School Aged Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Ann E Geers; Madhu Sundarrajan; Janet Lane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners.

Authors:  N S McGarr
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1983-09

8.  Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas; Allison L Sedey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.

Authors:  Ann Geers; Chris Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Miranda Cleary
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  55 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation updates: the Dallas Cochlear Implant Program.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Psychosocial adjustment in adolescents who have used cochlear implants since preschool.

Authors:  Jean S Moog; Ann E Geers; Christine H Gustus; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Michael J Strube; Emily A Tobey; David B Pisoni; Jean S Moog
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Executive functioning skills in preschool-age children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jessica Beer; William G Kronenberger; Irina Castellanos; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Preschool speech intelligibility and vocabulary skills predict long-term speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Irina Castellanos; William G Kronenberger; Jessica Beer; Shirley C Henning; Bethany G Colson; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

8.  The effects of audibility and novel word learning ability on vocabulary level in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

9.  Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.

Authors:  Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.