Literature DB >> 21832891

Psychosocial adjustment in adolescents who have used cochlear implants since preschool.

Jean S Moog1, Ann E Geers, Christine H Gustus, Christine A Brenner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined psychosocial characteristics of students who had used a cochlear implant (CI) since preschool and were evaluated when they were in elementary grades and again in high school. The study had four goals: (1) to determine the extent to which psychosocial skills documented in elementary grades were maintained into high school; (2) to assess the extent to which long-term CI users identified with the Deaf community or the hearing world or both; (3) to examine the association between group identification and the student's sense of self-esteem, preferred communication mode, and spoken language skills; and (4) to describe the extracurricular world of the teenagers who were mainstreamed with hearing age-mates for most of their academic experience.
DESIGN: As part of a larger study, 112 CI students (aged 15.0 to 18.6 yrs) or their parents completed questionnaires describing their social skills, and a subsample of 107 CI students completed group identification and self-esteem questionnaires. Results were compared with either a control group of hearing teenagers (N = 46) or age-appropriate hearing norms provided by the assessment developer.
RESULTS: Average psychosocial ratings from both parents and students at both elementary grades and high school indicated a positive self-image throughout the school years. Seventy percent of the adolescents expressed either strong identification with the hearing community (32%) or mixed identification with both deaf and hearing communities (38%). Almost all CI students (95%) were mainstreamed for more than half of the day, and the majority of students (85%) were in the appropriate grade for their age. Virtually all CI students (98%) reported having hearing friends, and a majority reported having deaf friends. More than 75% of CI students reported that they used primarily spoken language to communicate and that good spoken language skills enabled them to participate more fully in all aspects of their lives. Identification with the hearing world was not associated with personal or social adjustment problems but was associated with better speech perception and English language skill. Ninety-four percent were active participants in high school activities and sports, and 50% held part-time jobs (a rate similar to that documented for hearing teens).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of these early-implanted adolescents reported strong social skills, high self-esteem, and at least mixed identification with the hearing world. However, these results must be viewed in light of possible sources of sample selection bias and may not represent the psychosocial characteristics of the entire population of children receiving CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21832891      PMCID: PMC3160727          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182014c76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  26 in total

1.  Deaf cultural identity of adolescents with and without cochlear implants.

Authors:  R L Wald; J F Knutson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  How successful deaf teenagers experience and cope with isolation.

Authors:  E Charlson; M Strong; R Gold
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1992-07

3.  Factors influencing speech production in elementary and high school-aged cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Ann E Geers; Madhu Sundarrajan; Sujin Shin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The effect of context on the intelligibility of hearing and deaf children's speech.

Authors:  N S McGarr
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1981 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Cochlear implants for younger children: a preliminary description of the parental decision process and outcomes.

Authors:  T N Kluwin; D A Stewart
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  2000-03

6.  Article 1: Long-Term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: Sample characteristics and data collection methods.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Chris Brenner; Emily A Tobey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.

Authors:  Ann Geers; Chris Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Personal, social, and family adjustment in school-aged children with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Johanna G Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alain S Uziel; Martine Sillon; Adrienne Vieu; Françoise Artieres; Jean-Pierre Piron; Jean-Pierre Daures; Michel Mondain
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children.

Authors:  S Harter; R Pike
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Michael J Strube; Emily A Tobey; David B Pisoni; Jean S Moog
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Comparisons of Longitudinal Trajectories of Social Competence: Parent Ratings of Children With Cochlear Implants Versus Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Michael F Hoffman; Ivette Cejas; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Speech Intelligibility and Psychosocial Functioning in Deaf Children and Teens with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Valerie Freeman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Irina Castellanos
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Reading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Heather Hayes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Lisa S Davidson; Judith Lieu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-10-07

6.  Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob Oleson; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst; J Bruce Tomblin; Haihong Ji; Karen I Kirk; Bob McMurray; Marlan Hanson; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Executive functioning skills in long-term users of cochlear implants: a case control study.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Shirley C Henning; Bethany G Colson
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Psychosocial Outcomes in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Irina Castellanos; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Survey of Cochlear Implant User Satisfaction with the Neptune™ Waterproof Sound Processor.

Authors:  Jeroen J Briaire; Andreas Büchner; Gennaro Auletta; Helena Arroyo; Carmen Zoilo; Patrizia Mancini; Roberta Buhagiar; Neelam Vaid; Nathalie Mathias
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 10.  Current trends in outcome studies for children with hearing loss and the need to establish a comprehensive framework of measuring outcomes in children with hearing loss in China.

Authors:  Xueman Liu
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.