Literature DB >> 15454499

The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students.

C B Traxler1.   

Abstract

This article presents a rich context of information for interpreting Stanford Achievement Test scores and for describing the achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. The publisher's national norming of the Stanford Achievement Test provides a context of actual performance of hearing students. The publisher's Performance Standards provide a context of expectations for hearing students as determined by a panel of experts. The Gallaudet Research Institute's norming of the test on a national sample of deaf and hard-of-hearing students provides a context of test performance by this special population. A smaller subsample of the deaf and hard-of-hearing students who take the same test levels as hearing students provides an additional reference group with respect to the Performance Standards. Information from these sources is brought together into two graphical contexts to address these questions: Can the normative data from the publisher's national standardization of the test with hearing students, and the normative data from the GRI's national norming of the test with deaf and hard-of-hearing students provide a useful context for the interpretation of individual test scores? Can they provide a useful way to examine achievement of groups of students? Can the new Performance Standards defined by the test publisher offer a useful context for test score interpretation for high-achieving deaf and hard-of-hearing students?

Year:  2000        PMID: 15454499     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/5.4.337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  64 in total

1.  Universal newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  H Patel; M Feldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Alex A del Giudice; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-11-11

3.  Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Allison L Sedey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reading Function and Content Words in Subtitled Videos.

Authors:  Izabela Krejtz; Agnieszka Szarkowska; Maria Łogińska
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-16

5.  Academic Achievement of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in an ASL/English Bilingual Program.

Authors:  Iva Hrastinski; Ronnie B Wilbur
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  A Technology-Assisted Language Intervention for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Rose Sheldon; Mekibib Altaye; Laura Lane; Lindsay Mays; Susan Wiley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Jeff B Pelz; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Mary Ellen Arndt; Rosemarie Seewagen
Journal:  Am Educ Res J       Date:  2005

8.  Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Greg Leigh; Patricia Sapere; Denis Burnham; Carol Convertino; Michael Stinson; Harry Knoors; Mathijs P J Vervloed; William Noble
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2006-08-23

9.  Can you hear me snore?

Authors:  Jennifer Accardo; Jennifer Reesman
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Early listening and speaking skills predict later reading proficiency in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.