Literature DB >> 28401347

Calculus migration characterization during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy by high-speed camera using suspended pendulum method.

Jian James Zhang1, Danop Rajabhandharaks2, Jason Rongwei Xuan2, Ray W J Chia2, Thomas Hasenberg2.   

Abstract

Calculus migration is a common problem during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy procedure to treat urolithiasis. A conventional experimental method to characterize calculus migration utilized a hosting container (e.g., a "V" grove or a test tube). These methods, however, demonstrated large variation and poor detectability, possibly attributed to the friction between the calculus and the container on which the calculus was situated. In this study, calculus migration was investigated using a pendulum model suspended underwater to eliminate the aforementioned friction. A high-speed camera was used to study the movement of the calculus which covered zero order (displacement), first order (speed), and second order (acceleration). A commercialized, pulsed Ho:YAG laser at 2.1 μm, a 365-μm core diameter fiber, and a calculus phantom (Plaster of Paris, 10 × 10 × 10 mm3) was utilized to mimic laser lithotripsy procedure. The phantom was hung on a stainless steel bar and irradiated by the laser at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 J energy per pulse at 10 Hz for 1 s (i.e., 5, 10, and 15 W). Movement of the phantom was recorded by a high-speed camera with a frame rate of 10,000 FPS. The video data files are analyzed by MATLAB program by processing each image frame and obtaining position data of the calculus. With a sample size of 10, the maximum displacement was 1.25 ± 0.10, 3.01 ± 0.52, and 4.37 ± 0.58 mm for 0.5, 1, and 1.5 J energy per pulse, respectively. Using the same laser power, the conventional method showed <0.5 mm total displacement. When reducing the phantom size to 5 × 5 × 5 mm3 (one eighth in volume), the displacement was very inconsistent. The results suggested that using the pendulum model to eliminate the friction improved sensitivity and repeatability of the experiment. A detailed investigation on calculus movement and other causes of experimental variation will be conducted as a future study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calculus; High-speed camera; Laser lithotripsy; Migration; Pendulum; Retropulsion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401347     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2202-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  15 in total

1.  Stone retropulsion during holmium:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ho Lee; R Tres Ryan; Joel M H Teichman; Jeehyun Kim; Bernard Choi; Navanit V Arakeri; A J Welch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser.

Authors:  Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian K Auge; Ricardo M Brizuela; Alon Z Weizer; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Preparation of artificial kidney stones of reproducible size, shape, and mass by precision injection molding.

Authors:  Robert I Carey; Christopher C Kyle; Donna L Carey; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Use of an antiretropulsion device to prevent stone retropulsion significantly increases the efficiency of pneumatic lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Witsanu Pengune; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro.

Authors:  David S Finley; Jasen Petersen; Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael Ahlering; David Chou; James Borin; Louis Eichel; Elspeth McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope. Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load?

Authors:  M C Cheung; F Lee; S K Yip; P C Tam
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients.

Authors:  Mario Sofer; James D Watterson; Timothy A Wollin; Linda Nott; Hassan Razvi; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism.

Authors:  G J Vassar; K F Chan; J M Teichman; R D Glickman; S T Weintraub; T J Pfefer; A J Welch
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hyun Wook Kang; Ho Lee; Joel M H Teichman; Junghwan Oh; Jihoon Kim; Ashley J Welch
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Dependence of calculus retropulsion dynamics on fiber size and radiant exposure during Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ho Lee; Robert T Ryan; Jeehyun Kim; Bernard Choi; Navanit V Arakeri; Joel M H Teichman; A J Welch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter.

Authors:  Jian J Zhang; Jonathan Rutherford; Metasebya Solomon; Brian Cheng; Jason R Xuan; Jason Gong; Honggang Yu; Michael L D Xia; Xirong Yang; Thomas Hasenberg; Sean Curran
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.

Authors:  Ralf Petzold; Arkadiusz Miernik; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.