Literature DB >> 11723145

Old adults exhibit greater motor output variability than young adults only during rapid discrete isometric contractions.

E A Christou1, L G Carlton.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of young and elderly individuals to control submaximum levels of force (5-90%) during continuous and rapid discrete isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris. Participants were 24 young (25.3 +/- 2.8 years) and 24 elderly individuals (73.3 +/- 5.5 years) that were healthy and active. The strength of elderly participants was approximately 40% lower than young participants. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) of force were greater during discrete contractions than during continuous isometric contractions. During continuous isometric contractions, young and elderly participants exhibited similar CVs of force. During discrete contractions, however, elderly participants exhibited greater CVs for peak force and impulse and greater standard deviations and CVs for temporal characteristics than young participants. Results suggest that the control of force in active elderly people declines only during rapid discrete contractions and that this decline may be associated with declines in temporal characteristics of the force production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11723145     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.12.b524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  44 in total

1.  Changes in muscle fascicles of tibialis anterior during anisometric contractions are not associated with motor-output variability of the ankle dorsiflexors in young and old adults.

Authors:  Mark Jesunathadas; Thorsten Rudroff; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Age-related differences in force variability and visual display.

Authors:  Edward Ofori; Jean M Samson; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Are age-related increases in force variability due to decrements in strength?

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The amplitude of force variability is correlated in the knee extensor and elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Paul D Mehoudar; Justus D Ortega
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Precision in isometric precision grip force is reduced in middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Påvel Lindberg; Chrystele Ody; Antoine Feydy; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor variability: within-subject correlations during separate and simultaneous contractions.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjørn Jørgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Hamacher; N B Singh; J H Van Dieën; M O Heller; W R Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Associations of isokinetic knee steadiness with hop performance in patients with ACL deficiency.

Authors:  Yong-Hao Pua; Peck-Hoon Ong; Jia-Ying Ho; Adam L Bryant; Kate E Webster; Ross A Clark
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Movement trajectory smoothness is not associated with the endpoint accuracy of rapid multi-joint arm movements in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Siddharth Sharma; Somesh Chakrabarti; Shahrzad H Zavaremi; George Stelmach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.