Literature DB >> 21799333

State-level cancer quality assessment and research: building and sustaining the data infrastructure.

Joseph Lipscomb1, Theresa W Gillespie.   

Abstract

Over a decade ago, the Institute of Medicine called for a national cancer data system in the United States to support quality-of-care assessment and improvement, including research on effective interventions. Although considerable progress has been achieved in cancer quality measurement and effectiveness research, the nation still lacks a population-based data infrastructure for accurately identifying cancer patients and tracking services and outcomes over time. For compelling reasons, the most effective pathway forward may be the development of state-level cancer data systems, in which central registry data are linked to multiple public and private secondary sources. These would include administrative/claims files from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers. Moreover, such a state-level system would promote rapid learning by encouraging adoption of near-real-time reporting and feedback systems, such as the Commission on Cancer's new Rapid Quality Reporting System. The groundwork for such a system is being laid in the state of Georgia, and similar work is advancing in other states. The pace of progress depends on the successful resolution of issues related to the application of information technology, financing, and governance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799333      PMCID: PMC4879873          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182296422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  14 in total

1.  Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  All-payer claims databases: state initiatives to improve health care transparency.

Authors:  Denise Love; William Custer; Patrick Miller
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2010-09

3.  Developing a claim-based version of the ACE-27 comorbidity index: a comparison with medical record review.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Susan A Sabatino; Gretchen Kimmick; Rosemary Cress; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Bin Huang; Wenke Hwang; Jonathan Liff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Asif Ahmad; S Yousuf Zafar; Jane L Wheeler; Jennifer Barsky Reese; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Building capacity to assess cancer care in the Medicaid population in New York State.

Authors:  Francis P Boscoe; Deborah Schrag; Kun Chen; Patrick J Roohan; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act in Georgia: effects on time to Medicaid enrollment.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Li-Nien Chien; Curtis S Florence; Cheryl Raskind-Hood
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A comparison of patterns of care of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients in a younger and Medigap commercially insured cohort.

Authors:  B E Hillner; M K McDonald; C E Desch; T J Smith; L T Penberthy; S M Retchin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.

Authors:  Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Eric C Schneider; Deborah Schrag; Joan McClure; Eva Lepisto; Molla S Donaldson; Katherine L Kahn; Jane C Weeks; Clifford Y Ko; Andrew K Stewart; Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing cancer care, outcomes, and costs across health systems: charting the course.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; K Robin Yabroff; Mark C Hornbrook; Anna Gigli; Silvia Francisci; Murray Krahn; Gemma Gatta; Annalisa Trama; Debra P Ritzwoller; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Ramzi Salloum; Neetu Chawla; Catia Angiolini; Emanuele Crocetti; Francesco Giusti; Stefano Guzzinati; Maura Mezzetti; Guido Miccinesi; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

2.  Linkage between Utah All Payers Claims Database and Central Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Jennifer Hornung Garvin; Kimberly A Herget; Mia Hashibe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Charles W Hawley; Dan Bolton; Carol Sweeney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Capitalizing on Central Registries for Expanded Cancer Surveillance and Research.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Julia Entwistle; Lindsay M Sabik; Richard C Lindrooth; Marcelo Perraillon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Linking Medicare, Medicaid, and cancer registry data to study the burden of cancers in West Virginia.

Authors:  Pramit A Nadpara; Suresh S Madhavan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2012-11-05

Review 5.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eboneé N Butler; Neetu Chawla; Jennifer Lund; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Laurel Borowski; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

7.  The Analytic Information Warehouse (AIW): a platform for analytics using electronic health record data.

Authors:  Andrew R Post; Tahsin Kurc; Sharath Cholleti; Jingjing Gao; Xia Lin; William Bornstein; Dedra Cantrell; David Levine; Sam Hohmann; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Validation of colorectal cancer surgery data from administrative data sources.

Authors:  Xue Li; Charlotte King; Christopher deGara; Jonathon White; Marcy Winget
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.