Literature DB >> 19189369

The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act in Georgia: effects on time to Medicaid enrollment.

E Kathleen Adams1, Li-Nien Chien, Curtis S Florence, Cheryl Raskind-Hood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000 (BCCPTA) allowed states to extend Medicaid to any woman aged <65 without insurance screened and found to need treatment either for breast or cervical cancer or for a precancerous cervical condition through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) or in Georgia, other provider sites.
METHODS: The authors used linked Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry (GCCR) and Medicaid data to test the: 1) likelihood of Medicaid enrollment in a given month and 2) time-to-enrollment (months) for those eventually enrolling. The authors used difference-in-differences analysis to estimate the effects of BCCPTA for breast or cervical cancer cases relative to a control group of women with other cancers. The authors controlled for sociodemographics, stage at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and county level factors related to insurance levels in the area.
RESULTS: Compared with the control cancer group, the hazard ratio of Medicaid enrollment for women with breast and cervical cancers increased post- vs pre-BCCPTA implementation. The estimated effect of this increase was that out of every 1000 women with breast cancer, BCCPTA led to 1.7 more (from 2.8 to 4.5 per month) enrolling in Medicaid. The results for women with local or later stages of cervical cancer indicated that of 1000 women with these cancers, the number enrolling in a given month increased by 3.4 due to BCCPTA. Results on time-to-enrollment indicated that the time between cancer diagnosis and enrollment was shortened by 7 to 8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The Georgia Medicaid program, in response to national legislation, increased the probability of women enrolling in Medicaid earlier and in turn, likely increased their cancer treatment options. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19189369     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Effect of the Breast and Ccervical Cancer Ttreatment Act on access to screening and treatment in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Janis E Campbell; David M Thompson; Anne E Pate
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2014-01

2.  Black-white differences in receipt and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy among breast cancer patients in a rural region of the US.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Lori A Pollack; A Blythe Ryerson; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Explaining variation across grantees in breast and cervical cancer screening proportions in the NBCCEDP.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme; Justin Trogdon; Wesley Crouse; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Enhancing screening and early detection among women transitioning to Medicare from the NBCCEDP in Georgia.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; A Rana Bayakly; Alissa K Berzen; Sarah Blake; Peter Joski; Chunyu Li; Ingrid J Hall; Susan A Sabatino
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  The effect of insurance status on mortality and procedural use in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sarah M Lyon; Nicole M Benson; Colin R Cooke; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Having Medicaid insurance negatively impacts outcomes in patients with head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  Arash O Naghavi; Michelle I Echevarria; G Daniel Grass; Tobin J Strom; Yazan A Abuodeh; Kamran A Ahmed; Youngchul Kim; Andy M Trotti; Louis B Harrison; Kosj Yamoah; Jimmy J Caudell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Comparing Breast Cancer Outcomes Between Medicaid and the Ohio Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Mark Schluchter; Cynthia Owusu; Gregory S Cooper; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 8.  State-level cancer quality assessment and research: building and sustaining the data infrastructure.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  The effect of Medicaid expansion on prescriptions for breast cancer hormonal therapy medications.

Authors:  Johanna Catherine Maclean; Michael T Halpern; Steven C Hill; Michael F Pesko
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Variations in Guideline-Concordant Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy in Rural Georgia.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.